Ahloui Komlan Florentin, Traoré Yakouba, Ganiou Gbénga Moussiliou et al.
Hasil untuk "math.GT"
Menampilkan 20 dari ~1972331 hasil · dari arXiv, CrossRef, Semantic Scholar
James M. Shook
AbstractLet be a nonincreasing degree sequence with even . In 1974, Kundu showed that if is graphic, then some realization of has a ‐factor. For , Busch et al. and later Seacrest for showed that if and is graphic, then there is a realization with a ‐factor whose edges can be partitioned into a ‐factor and edge‐disjoint 1‐factors. We improve this to any . In 1978, Brualdi and then Busch et al. in 2012, conjectured that . The conjecture is still open for . However, Busch et al. showed the conjecture is true when or . We explore this conjecture by first developing new tools that generalize edge‐exchanges. With these new tools, we can drop the assumption is graphic and show that if then has a realization with edge‐disjoint 1‐factors. From this we confirm the conjecture when or when is graphic and .
Yasuhiro Yamada, Toru Nakamura, Masaru Endo et al.
Yorie Nakahira, Yilin Mo
Shuo Zhang, Jun Z. Huang, Afshan Khaliq et al.
Tianyu Yang, Can Ding, Y. Jay Guo
Antonio F. Costa, Cam Van Quach Hongler
This paper is devoted to prove the existence of $q$-periodic alternating projections of prime alternating $q$-periodic knots. The main tool is the Menasco-Thistlethwaite's Flyping theorem. Let $K$ be an oriented prime alternating knot that is $q$-periodic with $q\geq 3$, i.e. $K$ admits a symmetry that is a rotation of order $q$. Then $K$ has an alternating $q$-periodic projection. As applications, we obtain the crossing number of a $q$ -periodic alternating knot with $q\geq 3$ is a multiple of $q$ and we give an elementary proof that the knot $12_{a634} $ is not 3-periodic; this proof does not depend on computer computations as in "Periodic knots and Heegaard Floer correction terms" by Stanilav Jabuka and Swatee Naik (arXiv:1307.5116 [math.GT]).
Yuh-Shyan Hwang, Jiann-Jong Chen, Wei-Jhih Hou et al.
Suman Kumar
Namhun Koo, Gook Hwa Cho, Soonhak Kwon
Stan Zurek
Jozef H. Przytycki
This paper is a sequel to my essay "Distributivity versus associativity in the homology theory of algebraic structures" Demonstratio Math., 44(4), 2011, 821-867 (arXiv:1109.4850 [math.GT]). We start from naive invariants of arc colorings and survey associative and distributive magmas and their homology with relation to knot theory. We outline potential relations to Khovanov homology and categorification, via Yang-Baxter operators. We use here the fact that Yang-Baxter equation can be thought of as a generalization of self-distributivity. We show how to define and visualize Yang-Baxter homology, in particular giving a simple description of homology of biquandles.
D. DeTurck, H. Gluck, R. Komendarczyk et al.
We describe a new approach to triple linking invariants and integrals, aiming for a simpler, wider and more natural applicability to the search for higher order helicities of fluid flows and magnetic fields. To each three-component link in Euclidean 3-space, we associate a geometrically natural generalized Gauss map from the 3-torus to the 2-sphere, and show that the pairwise linking numbers and Milnor triple linking number that classify the link up to link homotopy correspond to the Pontryagin invariants that classify its generalized Gauss map up to homotopy. This can be viewed as a natural extension of the familiar fact that the linking number of a two-component link in 3-space is the degree of its associated Gauss map from the 2-torus to the 2-sphere. When the pairwise linking numbers are all zero, we give an integral formula for the triple linking number analogous to the Gauss integral for the pairwise linking numbers, but patterned after J.H.C. Whitehead's integral formula for the Hopf invariant. The integrand in this formula is geometrically natural in the sense that it is invariant under orientation-preserving rigid motions of 3-space, while the integral itself can be viewed as the helicity of a related vector field on the 3-torus. In the first paper of this series [math.GT 1101.3374] we did this for three-component links in the 3-sphere. Komendarczyk has applied this approach in special cases to derive a higher order helicity for magnetic fields whose ordinary helicity is zero, and to obtain from this nonzero lower bounds for the field energy.
M. Carfora, A. Marzuoli
C. Leininger
The main result of this paper, Simon's conjecture for fibered knots, was previously proven by Silver and Whitten math.GT/0405462 with essentially the same proof. This paper is therefore being withdrawn. The author would like to apologize for having missed this.
Tsuyoshi Kobayashi, Yo'av Rieck
We show that there exist knots K in S^3 with g(E(K))=2 and g(E(K#K#K))=6. Together with Theorem~1.5 of [1], this proves existence of counterexamples to Morimoto's Conjecture (Conjecture 1.5 of [2]). This is a special case of arxiv.org/abs/math.GT/0701765 [1] Tsuyoshi Kobayashi and Yo'av Rieck. On the growth rate of the tunnel number of knots. J. Reine Angew. Math., 592:63--78, 2006. [2] Kanji Morimoto. On the super additivity of tunnel number of knots.Math. Ann., 317(3):489--508, 2000.
S. Garoufalidis, M. Loebl
AbstractThe colored Jones function of a knot is a sequence of Laurent polynomials that encodes the Jones polynomial of a knot and its parallels. It has been understood in terms of representations of quantum groups and Witten gave an intrinsic quantum field theory interpretation of the colored Jones function as the expectation value of Wilson loops of a 3-dimensional gauge theory, the Chern–Simons theory. We present the colored Jones function as an evaluation of the inverse of a non-commutative fermionic partition function. This result is in the form familiar in quantum field theory, namely the inverse of a generalized determinant. Our formula also reveals a direct relation between the Alexander polynomial and the colored Jones function of a knot and immediately implies the extensively studied Melvin–Morton–Rozansky conjecture, first proved by Bar–Natan and the first author about 10 years ago. Our results complement recent work of Huynh and Le, who also give a non-commutative formulae for the colored Jones function of a knot, starting from a non-commutative formula for the R matrix of the quantum group $$U_{q}(\mathfrak{sl}_{2})$$; see Huynh and Le (in math.GT/0503296).
James F. Conant
In recent work with J.Mostovoy and T.Stanford,the author found that for every natural number n, a certain polynomial in the coefficients of the Conway polynomial is a primitive integer-valued degree n Vassiliev invariant, but that modulo 2, it becomes degree n-1. The conjecture then naturally suggests itself that these primitive invariants are congruent to integer-valued degree n-1 invariants. In this note, the consequences of this conjecture are explored. Under an additional assumption, it is shown that this conjecture implies that the Conway polynomial of an amphicheiral knot has the property that C(z)C(iz)C(z^2) is a perfect square inside the ring of power series with integer coefficients, or, equivalently, the image of C(z)C(iz)C(z^2) is a perfect square inside the ring of polynomials with Z_4 coefficients. In fact, it is probably the case that the Conway polynomial of an amphicheiral knot always can be written as f(z)f(-z) for some polynomial f(z) with integer coefficients, and this actually implies the above "perfect squares" conditions. Indeed, by work of Kawauchi and Hartley, this is known for all negative amphicheiral knots and for all strongly positive amphicheiral knots. In general it remains unsolved, and this paper can be seen as some evidence that it is indeed true in general. [Added 2/22/12: Of note is the recent paper arXiv:1106.5634v1 [math.GT] by Ermotti, Hongler and Weber, which finds a counterexample to the conjecture that all Conway polynomials of amphicheiral knots are of the form f(z)f(-z). Intriguingly, their main example still satisfies C(z)C(iz)C(z^2)=f(z)^2 for a power series f(z), making the main conjecture of the present paper that much more compelling, in the author's opinion.]
Warren Dicks, T. Schick
Paper withdrawn because of a gap in the proof of Proposition 3 of Thomas Schick: "Integrality of L2-Betti numbers", Math. Ann. 317, 727-750 (arXiv.org/abs/math.gt/0001101). Most results of the withdrawn paper were based on this proposition.
Y. Yamaguchi
Halaman 3 dari 98617