Autophagy and migrasome formation constitute critical cellular mechanisms for maintaining cellular homeostasis, however, their potential compensatory interplay remains poorly understood. In this study, we identify VPS39, a core component of the HOPS complex, as a molecular switch coordinating these processes. Genetic ablation of VPS39 not only impairs autophagic flux but also triggers cell migration through RhoA/Rac1 GTPases upregulation, consequently facilitating migrasome formation. Using super-resolution microscopy, we further demonstrate that migrasomes serve as an alternative disposal route for damaged mitochondria during VPS39-induced autophagy impairment, revealing a novel stress adaptation mechanism. Our work establishes a previously unrecognized autophagy-migrasome axis and provides direct visual evidence of organelle quality control via migrasomal extrusion. These findings position VPS39-regulated pathway switching as a potential therapeutic strategy for neurodegenerative diseases characterized by autophagy dysfunction.
Imperfect molecular detection in single-cell experiments introduces technical noise that obscures the true stochastic dynamics of gene regulatory networks. While binomial models of molecular capture provide a principled description of imperfect detection, they have so far been analyzed only for simple gene-expression models that do not explicitly account for regulation. Here, we extend binomial models of capture to general gene regulatory networks to understand how imperfect capture reshapes the observed time-dependent statistics of molecular counts. Our results reveal when capture effects correspond to a renormalization of a subset of the kinetic rates and when they cannot be absorbed into effective rates, providing a systematic basis for interpreting noisy single-cell measurements. In particular, we show that rate renormalization emerges either under significant transcription factor abundance or when promoter-state transitions occur on a distinct (much slower or faster) timescale than other reactions. In these cases, technical noise causes the apparent mean burst size of synthesized gene products to appear reduced while transcription factor binding reactions appear faster. These effects hold for gene regulatory networks of arbitrary connectivity and remain valid under time-dependent kinetic rates.
This paper explores some basic concepts of Biochemical Systems Theory (BST) and Metabolic Control Analysis (MCA), two frameworks developed to understand the behavior of biochemical networks. Initially introduced by Savageau, BST focuses on system stability and employs power laws in modeling biochemical systems. On the other hand, MCA, pioneered by authors such as Kacser and Burns and Heinrich and Rapoport, emphasizes linearization of the governing equations and describes relationships (known as theorems) between different measures. Despite apparent differences, both frameworks are shown to be equivalent in many respects. Through a simple example of a linear chain, the paper demonstrates how BST and MCA yield identical results when analyzing steady-state behavior and logarithmic gains within biochemical pathways. This comparative analysis highlights the interchangeability of concepts such as kinetic orders, elasticities and other logarithmic gains.
Living cells inherently exhibit the ability to spontaneously reorganize their structures in response to changes in both their internal and external environments. Among these responses, the organization of stress fibers composed of actin molecules changes in direct accordance with the mechanical stiffness of their environments. On soft substrates, SFs are rarely formed, but as stiffness increases, they emerge with random orientation, progressively align, and eventually form thicker bundles as stiffness surpasses successive thresholds. These transformations share similarities with phase transitions studied in condensed matter physics, yet despite extensive research on cellular dynamics, the introduction of the statistical mechanics perspective to the environmental dependence of intracellular structures remains underexplored. With this physical framework, we identify key relationships governing these intracellular transitions, highlighting the delicate balance between energy and entropy. Our analysis provides a unified understanding of the stepwise phase transitions of actin structures, offering new insights into related biological mechanisms. Notably, our study suggests the existence of mechanical checkpoints in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, which sequentially regulate the formation of intracellular structures to ensure proper cell cycle progression.
Anna Weber, Aurélien Pélissier, María Rodríguez Martínez
Recent advancements in immune sequencing and experimental techniques are generating extensive T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire data, enabling the development of models to predict TCR binding specificity. Despite the computational challenges due to the vast diversity of TCRs and epitopes, significant progress has been made. This paper discusses the evolution of the computational models developed for this task, with a focus on machine learning efforts, including the early unsupervised clustering approaches, supervised models, and the more recent applications of Protein Language Models (PLMs). We critically assess the most prominent models in each category, and discuss recurrent challenges, such as the lack of generalization to new epitopes, dataset biases, and biases in the validation design of the models. Furthermore, our paper discusses the transformative role of transformer-based protein models in bioinformatics. These models, pretrained on extensive collections of unlabeled protein sequences, can convert amino acid sequences into vectorized embeddings that capture important biological properties. We discuss recent attempts to leverage PLMs to deliver very competitive performances in TCR-related tasks. Finally, we address the pressing need for improved interpretability in these often opaque models, proposing strategies to amplify their impact in the field.
Elisa Gallo, Stefano De Renzis, James Sharpe
et al.
The discovery of general principles underlying the complexity and diversity of cellular and developmental systems is a central and long-standing aim of biology. Whilst new technologies collect data at an ever-accelerating rate, there is growing concern that conceptual progress is not keeping pace. We contend that this is due to a paucity of appropriate conceptual frameworks to serve as a basis for general theories of mesoscale biological phenomena. In exploring this issue, we have developed a foundation for one such framework, termed the Core and Periphery (C&P) hypothesis, which reveals hidden generality across the diverse and complex behaviors exhibited by cells and tissues. Here, we present the C&P concept, provide examples of its applicability across multiple scales, argue its consistency with evolution, and discuss key implications and open questions. We propose that the C&P hypothesis could unlock new avenues of conceptual progress in cell and developmental biology.
The complexity of mathematical models in biology has rendered model reduction an essential tool in the quantitative biologist's toolkit. For stochastic reaction networks described using the Chemical Master Equation, commonly used methods include time-scale separation, the Linear Mapping Approximation and state-space lumping. Despite the success of these techniques, they appear to be rather disparate and at present no general-purpose approach to model reduction for stochastic reaction networks is known. In this paper we show that most common model reduction approaches for the Chemical Master Equation can be seen as minimising a well-known information-theoretic quantity between the full model and its reduction, the Kullback-Leibler divergence defined on the space of trajectories. This allows us to recast the task of model reduction as a variational problem that can be tackled using standard numerical optimisation approaches. In addition we derive general expressions for the propensities of a reduced system that generalise those found using classical methods. We show that the Kullback-Leibler divergence is a useful metric to assess model discrepancy and to compare different model reduction techniques using three examples from the literature: an autoregulatory feedback loop, the Michaelis-Menten enzyme system and a genetic oscillator.
To shorten the time required to find effective new drugs, like antivirals, a key parameter to consider is membrane permeability, as a compound intended for an intracellular target with poor permeability will have low efficacy. Here, we present a computational model that considers both drug characteristics and membrane properties for the rapid assessment of drugs permeability through the coronavirus envelope and various cellular membranes. We analyze 79 drugs that are considered as potential candidates for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and determine their time of permeation in different organelle membranes grouped by viral baits and mammalian processes. The computational results are correlated with experimental data, present in the literature, on bioavailability of the drugs, showing a negative correlation between fast permeation and most promising drugs. This model represents an important tool capable of evaluating how permeability affects the ability of compounds to reach both intended and unintended intracellular targets in an accurate and rapid way. The method is general and flexible and can be employed for a variety of molecules, from small drugs to nanoparticles, as well to a variety of biological membranes.
regulation largely unexplored, in part due to methodological limitations. Indeed, we review evidence demonstrating that commonly used methods, such as transcriptomics, are inadequate because the variability in mRNAs coding for ribosomal proteins (RP) does not necessarily correspond to RP variability. Thus protein remodeling of ribosomes should be investigated by methods that allow direct quantification of RPs, ideally of isolated ribosomes. We review such methods, focusing on mass spectrometry and emphasizing method-specific biases and approaches to control these biases. We argue that using multiple complementary methods can help reduce the danger of interpreting reproducible systematic biases as evidence for ribosome remodeling.