Hasil untuk "Ecology"

H. I. Freedman

M. Goodfellow, S. Williams

C. Townsend

A. J. Gaston, J. Warham

W. Platt

R. Whittaker

D. Richardson, P. Pyšek

P. Johnson, S. Shifley, R. Rogers

Raymond B. Huey

E. Gosling

M. Leibold, M. McPeek

J. Curry, O. Schmidt

Sasha R. X. Dall, A. Bell, D. Bolnick et al.

Anqi Wang, Yue Hua, Xinyue Zhang et al.

Hyper-learning and Unlearning is a speculative animation that reflect how learning is reconfigured within digital media ecologies. Using architectural education as a microcosm, the work reframes the city as a hyper-learning apparatus where urban space, algorithmic systems, and platform infrastructures condition cognition and agency. By staging both hyper-learning and the unlearning induced by machine-supported cognition, the work critiques institutional gatekeeping while revealing how platforms reshape expertise, memory, and spatial experience. This project invites viewers to reconsider how urban space becomes pedagogical infrastructure in a posthumanism era.

W. Michener, Matthew B. Jones

Ecology is evolving rapidly and increasingly changing into a more open, accountable, interdisciplinary, collaborative and data-intensive science. Discovering, integrating and analyzing massive amounts of heterogeneous data are central to ecology as researchers address complex questions at scales from the gene to the biosphere. Ecoinformatics offers tools and approaches for managing ecological data and transforming the data into information and knowledge. Here, we review the state-of-the-art and recent advances in ecoinformatics that can benefit ecologists and environmental scientists as they tackle increasingly challenging questions that require voluminous amounts of data across disciplines and scales of space and time. We also highlight the challenges and opportunities that remain.

Anahí Rodríguez-Martínez, Silvia Bartolucci, Francesco Caravelli et al.

Understanding how credit flows through inter-firm networks is critical for assessing financial stability and systemic risk. In this study, we introduce DebtStreamness, a novel metric inspired by trophic levels in ecological food webs, to quantify the position of firms within credit chains. By viewing credit as the ``primary energy source'' of the economy, we measure how far credit travels through inter-firm relationships before reaching its final borrowers. Applying this framework to Uruguay's inter-firm credit network, using survey data from the Central Bank, we find that credit chains are generally short, with a tiered structure in which some firms act as intermediaries, lending to others further along the chain. We also find that local network motifs such as loops can substantially increase a firm's DebtStreamness, even when its direct borrowing from banks remains the same. Comparing our results with standard economic classifications based on input-output linkages, we find that DebtStreamness captures distinct financial structures not visible through production data. We further validate our approach using two maximum-entropy network reconstruction methods, demonstrating the robustness of DebtStreamness in capturing systemic credit structures. These results suggest that DebtStreamness offers a complementary ecological perspective on systemic credit risk and highlights the role of hidden financial intermediation in firm networks.

Jennifer Shi, Christopher K. Frantz, Christian Kimmich et al.

Designing institutions for social-ecological systems requires models that capture heterogeneity, uncertainty, and strategic interaction. Multiple modeling approaches have emerged to meet this challenge, including empirical game-theoretic analysis (EGTA), which merges ABM's scale and diversity with game-theoretic models' formal equilibrium analysis. The newly popular class of LLM-driven simulations provides yet another approach, and it is not clear how these approaches can be integrated with one another, nor whether the resulting simulations produce a plausible range of behaviours for real-world social-ecological governance. To address this gap, we compare four LLM-augmented frameworks: procedural ABMs, generative ABMs, LLM-EGTA, and expert guided LLM-EGTA, and evaluate them on a real-world case study of irrigation and fishing in the Amu Darya basin under centralized and decentralized governance. Our results show: first, procedural ABMs, generative ABMs, and LLM-augmented EGTA models produce strikingly different patterns of collective behaviour, highlighting the value of methodological diversity. Second, inducing behaviour through system prompts in LLMs is less effective than shaping behaviour through parameterized payoffs in an expert-guided EGTA-based model.

Shing Yan Li, Mehran Kardar, Zhijie Feng et al.

In complex ecological communities, species may self-organize into clusters or clumps where highly similar species can coexist. The emergence of such species clusters can be captured by the interplay between neutral and niche theories. Based on the generalized Lotka-Volterra model of competition, we propose a minimal model for ecological communities in which the steady states contain self-organized clusters. In this model, species compete only with their neighbors in niche space through a common interaction strength. Unlike many previous theories, this model does not rely on random heterogeneity in interactions. By varying only the interaction strength, we find an exponentially large set of cluster patterns with different sizes and combinations. There are sharp phase transitions into the formation of clusters. There are also multiple phase transitions between different sets of possible cluster patterns, many of which accumulate near a small number of critical points. We analyze such a phase structure using both numerical and analytical methods. In addition, the special case with only nearest neighbor interactions is exactly solvable using the method of transfer matrices from statistical mechanics. We analyze the critical behavior of these systems and make comparisons with existing lattice models.

Boyu Ma, Jiaxiao Shi, Yiming Ji et al.

This article proposes the Ecological Cycle Optimizer (ECO), a novel metaheuristic algorithm inspired by energy flow and material cycling in ecosystems. ECO draws an analogy between the dynamic process of solving optimization problems and ecological cycling. Unique update strategies are designed for the producer, consumer and decomposer, aiming to enhance the balance between exploration and exploitation processes. Through these strategies, ECO is able to achieve the global optimum, simulating the evolution of an ecological system toward its optimal state of stability and balance. Moreover, the performance of ECO is evaluated against five highly cited algorithms-CS, HS, PSO, GWO, and WOA-on 23 classical unconstrained optimization problems and 24 constrained optimization problems from IEEE CEC-2006 test suite, verifying its effectiveness in addressing various global optimization tasks. Furthermore, 50 recently developed metaheuristic algorithms are selected to form the algorithm pool, and comprehensive experiments are conducted on IEEE CEC-2014 and CEC-2017 test suites. Among these, five top-performing algorithms, namely ARO, CFOA, CSA, WSO, and INFO, are chosen for an in-depth comparison with the ECO on the IEEE CEC-2020 test suite, verifying the ECO's exceptional optimization performance. Finally, in order to validate the practical applicability of ECO in complex real-world problems, five state-of-the-art algorithms, including NSM-SFS, FDB-SFS, FDB-AGDE, L-SHADE, and LRFDB-COA, along with four best-performing algorithms from the "CEC2020 competition on real-world single objective constrained optimization", namely SASS, sCMAgES, EnMODE, and COLSHADE, are selected for comparative experiments on five engineering problems from CEC-2020-RW test suite (real-world engineering problems), demonstrating that ECO achieves performance comparable to those of advanced algorithms.