Hasil untuk "Engineering"

P. Mali, K. Esvelt, G. Church

Y. Pei, Heng Wang, G. J. Snyder

Andrew M. Smith, S. Nie

B. Chan, K. Leong

N. Guimard, Natalia Gomez, C. Schmidt

Willis A. Jensen, L. Freeman

Heungsoo Shin, S. Jo, A. Mikos

D. Broek, J. Rice

J. Barth, G. Costantini, K. Kern

P. Gunatillake, R. Adhikari

Drew Endy

Asunción Gómez-Pérez, M. Fernández-López, Óscar Corcho

N. Engheta, R. Ziolkowski

K. Basso, Adam A. Margolin, G. Stolovitzky et al.

Tom Gaertner

Tara C. Dennehy, Nilanjana Dasgupta

Ke Mao, L. Capra, M. Harman et al.

A. Madni, Michael Sievers

R. Hadgraft, A. Kolmos

ABSTRACT Three major challenges, sustainability, the fourth industrial revolution, and employability, will require new types of engineering programs, to help students develop skills in cross-disciplinarity, complexity, and contextual understanding. Future engineering students should be able to understand the needs for technological, sustainable solutions in context. The engineering graduates should be able to act in complex and chaotic situations. The question is how engineering institutions are responding now and how they should respond in the future. This article analyses the general responses from engineering education over the last 20 years. These responses are student-centred learning, integration of theory and practice, digital and online learning, and the definition of professional competencies. Examples are given of institutions that are already applying several of these components in the curriculum. On the long-term horizon, more personalised curriculum models are emerging based on students developing and documenting their own learning and career trajectories, as part of their lifelong learning strategy.

Kaitlin Henderson, A. Salado

Traditional document‐based practices in systems engineering are being transitioned to model‐based ones. Adoption of model‐based systems engineering (MBSE) continues to grow in industry and government, and MBSE continues to be a major research theme in the systems engineering community. In fact, MBSE remains a central element in the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE)’s vision for 2025. Examining systems engineering literature, this paper presents an assessment of the extent to which benefits and value of MBSE are supported by empirical evidence. A systematic review of research and practice papers in major systems engineering archival journals and conference proceedings was conducted. Evidence was categorized in four types, two of which inductively emerged from the results: measured, observed (without a formal measurement process), perceived (claimed without evidence), and backed by other references. Results indicate that two thirds of claimed MBSE benefits are only supported by perceived evidence, while only two papers reported measured evidence. The aggregate assessment presented in this paper indicates that claims about the value and benefits of MBSE are mainly based on expectation. We argue that evidence supporting the value and benefits of MBSE remains inconclusive.