Hasil untuk "Philosophy. Psychology. Religion"

Menampilkan 20 dari ~2078977 hasil · dari CrossRef

JSON API
CrossRef Open Access 2022
Press in the Works of Russian Literature

N. V. Shevtsov, E. E. Naumova

Russian classical literature of the 19th and early 20th centuries constitutes the whole with the finest Russian journalism of the same period. Almost all famous authors started their careers by releasing their first works of literature in magazines and even in newspapers. Nevertheless, even when gaining popularity, they continued to cooperate with periodicals, offering them their masterpieces. Thus, Leo Tolstoy published his novels War and Peace and Anna Karenina in the Russkiy Vestnik [Russian Herald] magazine, while his novel Resurrection was published in Niva, the most popular Russian magazine aimed at mass reader. The writer wanted to reach as many ordinary people as possible. Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, Demons, and The Brothers Karamazov first appeared in the same Russkiy Vestnik, along with Ivan Turgenev’s novel Fathers and Sons. This list is long indeed. Russian authors actively employed material published in press in their works. Therefore, the characters of Anna Karenina passionately discussed the events highlighted by the newspapers and magazines of that time. The references to certain periodicals, their brief description made it possible to understand better the mood and to expose the nature of their characters for the readers. During Soviet times, the attitude of the characters to certain newspapers and magazines displayed the role of media in public relations and their place in the political system of the country. Finally, thanks to the media subscriptions of the characters in novels and short stories, the reader could better understand their worldview, hobbies, and dreams. The authors set themselves the task of studying the specifics of the use of references to certain media as an artistic detail in literary works. They attempt to identify the role of such details in creating the artistic character, as well as in recreating the atmosphere and ideology of the era. They also examine references to journal articles read by the characters of a literary work from the perspective of intertextuality theory, as well as the task of revealing the peculiarities of the interaction of artistic and journalistic texts in the context of the era. The authors also raise the question of the possibility of using texts of literary works as a source for the study of media history.

1 sitasi en
CrossRef Open Access 2020
The Peculiarities of Japanese Periodisation: A New Era of Reiwa

N. N. Izotova

The article addresses the Japanese periodization system, 元号 — gengo:, also called 年号 — nengo:, which shows the number of years from the accession of the ruling emperor. This issue has grown in importance with the view to the recent imperial succession of 2019. Aimed at providing an outline of origins and reasons for the change of era names, the article explicates official narratives in the diachronic field. Being a topical issue due to high importance for the national character, national values, symbolism and the popular veneration of the monarchy, the change of the 248th gengo: as the result of the enthronement of emperor Naruhito on May 1, 2019, is particularly analysed. The paper uses historical, cultural, legal, structural and system analysis of national calendar shifts. The background of choosing Reiwa as a new era name in modern Japan is revealed in the review of the current political discourse, the legal procedure with special attention to state acts for selecting and approving national gengo:. It is concluded that gengo: is a universal category coined for labeling current historical periods, but it also has a multi-level meaning, a specific code of cultural memory, which reflects the history and continuity of spiritual values. So do the messages rendered by every (and current) gengo:, as they formulate national strategies in a special symbolic form.

CrossRef 2021
Rasāsvāda: A Comparative Approach to Emotion and the Self

Sthaneshwar Timalsina, Society for Indian Philosophy and Religion

This paper explores the philosophy of emotion in classical India. Although some scholars have endeavored to develop a systematic philosophy of emotion based on rasa theory, no serious effort has been made to read the relationship between emotion and the self in light of rasa theory. This exclusion, I argue, is an outcome of a broader presupposition that the 'self' in classical Indian philosophies is outside the scope of emotion. A fresh reading of classical Sanskrit texts finds this premise baseless. With an underlying assumption that emotion and self are inherently linked, this paper explores similarities between the Indian and Chinese approaches.

Halaman 69 dari 103949