Hasil untuk "Political science"

T. Porter

What accounts for the prestige of quantitative methods? The usual answer is that quantification is desirable in social investigation as a result of its successes in science. This book questions whether such success in the study of stars, molecules, or cells should be an attractive model for research on human societies, and examines why the natural sciences are highly quantitative in the first place. The book argues that a better understanding of the attractions of quantification in business, government, and social research brings a fresh perspective to its role in psychology, physics, and medicine. Quantitative rigor is not inherent in science but arises from political and social pressures, and objectivity derives its impetus from cultural contexts. A new preface sheds light on the current infatuation with quantitative methods, particularly at the intersection of science and bureaucracy.

L. Slobodkin, R. Lewin

J. Pierre

M. Keck, K. Sikkink

B. Latour

Judith Grant

Robert Gorwa

ABSTRACT Following a host of high-profile scandals, the political influence of platform companies (the global corporations that that operate online ‘platforms’ such as Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube, and many other online services) is slowly being re-evaluated. Amidst growing calls to regulate these companies and make them more democratically accountable, and a host of policy interventions that are actively being pursued in Europe and beyond, a better understanding of how platform practices, policies, and affordances (in effect, how platforms govern) interact with the external political forces trying to shape those practices and policies is needed. Building on digital media and communication scholarship as well as governance literature from political science and international relations, the aim of this article is to map an interdisciplinary research agenda for platform governance, a concept intended to capture the layers of governance relationships structuring interactions between key parties in today's platform society, including platform companies, users, advertisers, governments, and other political actors.

James Mahoney, Gary Goertz

Andrew Bennett, Colin Elman

A. Comas-Herrera

Daniel Pemstein, Kyle L. Marquardt, Eitan Tzelgov et al.

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (SES-1423944, PI: Daniel Pemstein), Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (Grant M13-0559:1, PI: Staffan I. Lindberg), the Swedish Research Council (2013.0166, PI: Staffan I. Lindberg and Jan Teorell), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (PI: Staffan I. Lindberg), and the University of Gothenburg (E 2013/43); as well as internal grants from the Vice-Chancellor’s office, the Dean of the College of Social Sciences, and the Department of Political Science at University of Gothenburg. Marquardt acknowledges research support from the Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5-100.’ We performed simulations and other computational tasks using resources provided by the Notre Dame Center for Research Computing (CRC) through the High Performance Computing section and the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at the National Supercomputer Centre in Sweden (SNIC 2016/1-382, SNIC 2017/1-406 and 2017/1-68). We specifically acknowledge the assistance of In-Saeng Suh at CRC and Johan Raber and Peter Mu nger at SNIC in facilitating our use of their respective systems.

A. Feldman

C. Pateman

David J. Weerts

University of Wisconsin-Madison: Professor of Law and Sociology July 1990-present, Public Affairs July 2012-present and Political Science October 1991-December 2021 / Director Havens Wright Center for Social Justice 2019-present / Director COWS 1990-present / Associate Professor of Law and Sociology July 1988-June 1990 / Assistant Professor of Law and Sociology September 1987-June 1988; University of Miami School of Law: Associate Professor September 1986-June 1987; Rutgers University-Newark: Assistant Professor of Political Science, Law, and Management July 1984June 1986/Adjunct Assistant Professor of Political Science, Law, and Management July 1980-June 1984; Princeton University Department of Politics: Lecturer 1978-79/Assistant in Instruction 1977-78; Yale University Department of Political Science: Lecturer 1975

M. D. Carpini, S. Keeter

Barbara Harff

W. Reid, D. Chen, L. Goldfarb et al.

C. Anderson

S. Walgrave, P. Aelst

David Sabin-Miller, Mary McGrath, Marisa C. Eisenberg

The concept of ``ideology" is central to political discourse and dynamics, and is often cast as falling primarily on a one-dimensional scale from ``left-wing/liberal" to ``right-wing/conservative", but the validity of this simple quantitative treatment is uncertain. Here we investigate and compare various high-resolution measures of ideology, both internal (individuals self-identification and policy-stance agreements) and external (estimating the ideological position of political opinion statements). We find strong consistency between internal measures, although policy-stance agreement ideology yields a systematically centralizing and liberalizing portrait relative to subjective measures. More remarkably, we find that external assessments of ideology, while noisy, are largely consistent across observers, even for highly dissonant ideas and regardless of speaker identity markers. This supports the use of these responses as meaningful, comparable quantities, which general members of the public reliably project from the abstract space of political thought onto a shared one-dimensional domain. We end with observation of some broad initial patterns of political opinion acceptance, feelings towards the major political parties, and propensity for extreme thinking, finding mostly ideologically symmetric results strongly stratified by strong/lean/Independent political party identity. We hope these perspectives on quantification of political ideology serve as an invitation for a broader range of quantitative scientists to model and understand this vital societal arena.