Katy E. Trinkley, Shruti Gohil, Stacie A. Salsbury
et al.
Abstract Background Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) are conducted as part of routine care, which provides researchers and health systems multiple opportunities to study implementation processes and outcomes. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 32 ePCTs associated with the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory to assess the implementation-related outcomes that were measured or were planned to be measured, including reach (number and percent of eligible patients who participate in an intervention and the representativeness of those patients), patient engagement in or adherence to the intervention, adoption (number and percent of eligible organizations or clinicians that decide to take up or use an intervention), fidelity (clinician’s delivery of an intervention as intended), adaptations (changes or modifications to an intervention), sustainability (potential for an intervention to be maintained or institutionalized after a trial concludes), sustainment (actual maintenance or institutionalization of an intervention after a trial concludes), and costs. The trials represented different phases of progress (planned, ongoing, or completed). Results 91% of study teams completed the survey, and most (86%) reported measuring reach. The total number of teams measuring other outcomes was 76% for adherence, 45% for clinician adoption, 93% for fidelity, 69% for adaptations, 24% for sustainability, 38% for sustainment, and 31% for costs. Conclusion There is an opportunity for growth in measuring clinician adoption of the intervention, sustainability, sustainment, and associated costs. Measurement of these constructs in future ePCTs could result in development of improved implementation strategies to increase the likelihood of effective implementation leading to equitable, sustainable, and scalable improvement in practice.
Sheilah Hogg-Johnson, Carolina Cancelliere, Cameron Marshall
et al.
Objectives This study aims to examine the association of time to recovery between early versus late presentation to outpatient community-based concussion management clinics following sport-related concussion (SRC) among adolescent Canadian athletes.Methods Using electronic health records (between January 2017 and December 2019) from the Complete Concussion Management Inc (CCMI) database, this was a historical cohort study of Canadian athletes aged 12–18 presenting for care early (0–7 days) or late (8–28 days) after SRC. Time-to-recovery was defined as the date of clinician clearance to return to sport. Propensity scores were first derived from logistic regression with early versus late clinical presentation as the outcome. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was then used to model the relationship between early versus late clinical presentation and time to recovery, while including the propensity score to adjust for confounding. The association was expressed using hazard rate ratios (HRR) with 95% CIs.Results A total of 4696 patient records (mean age of 14.71 (±1.69 SD); 57.7% male) were eligible. Early presentation to a concussion management clinic following SRC was associated with faster time to recovery (adjusted HRR 1.23; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.32, p<0.001). This association was consistent within each quintile of the propensity score. The median time to recovery was 18 versus 22 days in the early and late groups, respectively.Conclusion Adolescent athletes with SRC have favourable recovery trajectories when presenting for care up to 28 days. Time to recovery (clinician clearance to return to sport) may be quicker with an earlier presentation which can lead to a faster return to sport.
Pascale Gränicher, Michel Kocher, Rob de Bie
et al.
Abstract Background Prehabilitation prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may mitigate deterioration in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during the preoperative period and support recovery after surgery. However, little is known about the feasibility of systematically monitoring HRQOL and pain through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in this context. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using validated HRQOL questionnaires and daily pain diaries during a prehabilitation programme for patients awaiting (TKA) and up to 12 weeks postoperatively. Methods Twenty patients (mean age 73 ± 6 years) scheduled for primary unilateral TKA were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). The IG participated in a 4- to 8-week individualised prehabilitation programme involving exercise and education. Feasibility was assessed through the completion rates of daily pain diaries and three HRQOL questionnaires (EQ-5D-5 L, SF-12 and KOOS KRQOL) collected at baseline, preoperatively, and at 6- and 12-weeks postoperatively. Results HRQOL questionnaires demonstrated high completion rates across both groups (90%). In contrast, adherence to paper-based pain diaries was suboptimal and notably low (CG: 58%; IG: 47%), falling below the threshold for meaningful analysis. Consequently, pain trajectory over time could not be reliably assessed. No significant group-by-time interaction effects were observed for any HRQOL measure: EQ-5D-5 L (p = 0.67; F = 0.51), KOOS KRQOL (p = 0.72; F = 0.64), SF-12 PCS (p = 0.06; F = 0.50) and MCS (p = 0.36; F = 0.10). Conclusion This pilot study confirms the feasibility and acceptability of HRQOL questionnaires in older patients undergoing prehabilitation before TKA. However, the low diary completion rates highlight the need for alternative pain-monitoring-approaches – such as electronic formats - to improve data quality in future trials. Preliminary findings suggest potential benefits of prehabilitation, warranting further investigation in larger studies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier; NCT05314985. Registered 20 July 2021. BASEC-Nr. 2020–03060.
H. Stephen Injeyan, Julita A. Teodorczyk-Injeyan, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
et al.
Background: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a debilitating condition with unclear underlying mechanisms. The presence of systemic biomarkers associated with inflammation in nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) has been inconsistently reported primarily through invasive blood sampling. Objective: This study evaluates the use of saliva as an alternative medium for assessing inflammatory biomarker levels in patients with CNSLBP. Design: Prospective cross-sectional pilot study. Methods: Twenty-five patients with CNSLBP and 25 age and sex matched asymptomatic participants were selected according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was determination of the levels of inflammatory biomarkers in unstimulated saliva samples of CNSLBP patients relative to controls using Luminex™ 200 technology. Secondary outcomes were pain, disability and anxiety/stress levels of participants. Results: In CNSLBP patients, 9 biomarkers interferon γ (IFNγ), interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-12p40, IL-12p70, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) were comparable to controls ( P = .25-.94). However, 4 pro-inflammatory mediators were significantly elevated, exhibiting medium to large effect sizes: IL-1β ( P = .028, Cohen’s d = 1.62), IL-6 ( P = .001, d = 1.0), IL-8 ( P = .002, d = 0.86), and MCP-1 ( P = .001, d = 0.77). Additionally, IL-1Ra levels were significantly higher, though with a small effect size ( P = .03, d = 0.43). A significant correlation ( P = .02) was observed between VAS pain scores and MCP-1 levels. Conclusion: Saliva represents a viable medium for assessing key inflammatory biomarkers in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP). Elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and the nociceptive chemokine MCP-1 were observed in comparison to asymptomatic controls, with MCP-1 showing a positive correlation with self-reported pain intensity. Future studies utilizing unstimulated saliva samples may further investigate changes in inflammatory biomarker levels to monitor treatment outcomes.
Hazel J. Jenkins, Benjamin T. Brown, Mary O’Keeffe
et al.
Abstract Background The management of low back pain (LBP) is highly variable and patients often receive management that is not recommended and/or miss out on recommended care. Clinician knowledge and behaviours are strongly influenced by entry-level clinical training and are commonly cited as barriers to implementing evidence-based management. Currently there are no internationally recognised curriculum standards for the teaching of LBP content to ensure graduating clinicians have the appropriate knowledge and competencies to assess and manage LBP. We formed an international interdisciplinary working group to develop curriculum content standards for the teaching of LBP in entry-level clinical training programs. Methods The working group included representatives from 11 countries: 18 academics and clinicians from healthcare professions who deal with the management of LBP (medicine, physiotherapy, chiropractic, osteopathy, pharmacology, and psychology), seven professional organisation representatives (medicine, physiotherapy, chiropractic, spine societies), and one healthcare consumer. A literature review was performed, including database and hand searches of guidelines and accreditation, curricula, and other policy documents, to identify gaps in current LBP teaching and recommended entry-level knowledge and competencies. The steering group (authors) drafted the initial LBP Curriculum Content Standards (LBP-CCS), which were discussed and modified through two review rounds with the working group. Results Sixty-two documents informed the draft standards. The final LBP-CCS consisted of four broad topics covering the epidemiology, biopsychosocial contributors, assessment, and management of LBP. For each topic, key knowledge and competencies to be achieved by the end of entry-level clinical training were described. Conclusion We have developed the LBP-CCS in consultation with an interdisciplinary, international working group. These standards can be used to inform or benchmark the content of curricula related to LBP in new or existing entry-level clinical training programs.
Jani Mikkonen, Hannu Luomajoki, Olavi Airaksinen
et al.
Abstract Background Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability globally. Exercise therapies are one of the commonly prescribed treatment options for CLBP. The specific exercise therapies for CLBP most commonly target movement dysfunction, but seldom brain-based pain modulation. Exercise therapies with specific breathing techniques (SBTs) have been shown to influence and enhance brain-based structural and functional pain modulation. Aims and objectives To assess the feasibility of the SBTs protocol, eligibility criteria, randomization, and dropout rates. To quantify the changes in patient outcome measures and choose the most relevant measure for larger-scale study. To quantify self-adherence levels to home exercise and monitor and record possible pain medication and other treatment modality usage, and adverse events during exercise. Design A parallel randomised analyst-blinded feasibility trial with two-month follow-up. Outcome measures Feasibility related to aims and objectives. Multiple pain- and health-related patient-reported outcome measures of pain intensity, disability, central sensitization, anxiety, kinesiophobia, catastrophising, self-efficacy, sleep quality, quality of life, and health and well-being status. Exercise adherence, pain medication and other treatment modality usage, and possible adverse events related to exercises will be monitored and recorded. Methods Thirty participants will be randomized to movement control exercise with SBTs (15 subjects in experimental group) or movement control exercise without SBTs (15 subjects in control group) in private chiropractic practice setting with two-month follow-up. Trial registration number; NCT05268822. Discussion The clinical difference in effectiveness between practically identical exercise programs in uniform study settings with or without SBTs has not been studied before. This study aims to inform feasibility and help determine whether progression to a full-scale trial is worthwhile.
Objectives: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess and compare the effectiveness of manual therapy in alleviating infant crying, a common symptom of nocturnal crying (NC) and infantile colic (IC). Methods: Total effective rate, crying time and adverse events were used as outcome indicators. To assess the quality, the risk of bias was determined for each study by two authors, using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.0 was used for data analysis. A total of 98 articles were identified from 6 electronic databases. Results: Among them, twenty-seven studies which included 13 NC and 14 IC were included. Meta-analysis showed favorable effects tuina therapy on total effective rate (TER) of NC (RR: 1.20 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.37], p = 0.007), chiropractic therapy on crying time change of IC (SMD: -0.83 [95% CI -1.61 to -0.06], p = 0.04) and massage on total crying time of IC (SMD: -0.86 [95% CI -1.09 to -0.63], p < 0.00001). This systematic review compares different manual therapies for the treatment of NC and IC. While tuina, chiropractic, and massage show results in alleviating symptoms, the overall evidence remains limited due to the low quality and heterogeneity of the included studies. Conclusion: Therefore, further high-quality research with unified control groups is needed to establish manual therapy as a recommended treatment option for NC and IC. Protocol registration number is CRD42022348143 01/08/2022.
Lobke P. De la Ruelle, Annemarie de Zoete, Cornelius Myburgh
et al.
<h4>Background</h4> Understanding care seeking behaviour is vital to enabling access to care. In the context of low back pain (LBP), chiropractors offer services to patients of all ages. Currently, geriatric sub-populations tend to be under-investigated, despite the disproportionate effects of LBP on older adults. In the Netherlands, the chiropractic profession is relatively unknown and therefore, generally speaking, is not considered as the first choice for conservative musculoskeletal primary health care. The aim of this paper was to explore the experiences of older adults with LBP, seeking chiropracic care for the first time, in order to identify perceived barriers and facilitators in this process. <h4>Methods</h4> Stage 1: Participants 56 years of age and older with chronic LBP who either sought or did not seek chiropractic care were interviewed to provide detailed information on the factors that promoted or impeded care-seeking behaviour. A purposive sampling strategy was used to recruit participants through a network of researchers, chiropractors and other healthcare professionals offering musculoskeletal health care services. Individuals with underlying pathology, previous surgery for LBP, or insufficient mastery of the Dutch language were excluded. Data were collected until saturation was reached and thematically analysed. Stage 2: To further explore the themes, a focus group interview was conducted with a provider stakeholder group consisting of:two physiotherapists, a nurse practitioner, a geriatrician, and a chiropractor. All interviews were conducted online, voice recorded, and transcribed verbatim. <h4>Results</h4> We interviewed 11 older adults with low back pain. During this process four themes emerged that captured their perception and experiences in either seeking or dismissing chiropractic care for their LBP; these being ‘generic’, ‘financial’, ‘expectation’, and ‘the image of the chiropractor’. The focus group members largely confirmed the identified themes, highlighting a lack of awarenes and accessibility as key barriers to care. On the other hand, whe chiropractior as an alternative care provider, with a focus on manual interventions, was seen as a facilitator. <h4>Conclusions</h4> The lack of knowledge about chiropractic care was found to be the most important barrier to seeking care. The most important facilitator was insufficient resolution of their symptoms following previous care, making patients look further for a solution for their problem. These barriers and facilitators seem not to differ greatly from barriers and facilitators found among younger patients with neck pain. Age and health condition may therefore be weak determinants of care. This new information may help us optimize accessibility for older adults to the chiropractor.
Bronwyn Sherriff, Carol Clark, Clare Killingback
et al.
Abstract Background Optimal shaping of contextual factors (CFs) during clinical encounters may be associated with analgesic responses in treatments for musculoskeletal pain. These CFs (i.e., the patient-practitioner relationship, patient’s and practitioner’s beliefs/characteristics, treatment characteristics, and environment) have not been widely evaluated by musculoskeletal practitioners. Understanding their views has the potential to improve treatment quality and effectiveness. Drawing on a panel of United Kingdom practitioners’ expertise, this study aimed to investigate their perceptions of CFs during the management of patients presenting with chronic low back pain (LBP). Methods A modified two-round online Delphi-consensus survey was conducted to measure the extent of panel agreement regarding the perceived acceptability and influence of five main types of CFs during clinical management of patients with chronic LBP. Qualified musculoskeletal practitioners in the United Kingdom providing regular treatment for patients with chronic LBP were invited to take part. Results The successive Delphi rounds included 39 and 23 panellists with an average of 19.9 and 21.3 years of clinical experience respectively. The panel demonstrated a high degree of consensus regarding approaches to enhance the patient-practitioner relationship (18/19 statements); leverage their own characteristics/beliefs (10/11 statements); modify the patient’s beliefs and consider patient’s characteristics (21/25 statements) to influence patient outcomes during chronic LBP rehabilitation. There was a lower degree of consensus regarding the influence and use of approaches related to the treatment characteristics (6/12 statements) and treatment environment (3/7 statements), and these CFs were viewed as the least important. The patient-practitioner relationship was rated as the most important CF, although the panel were not entirely confident in managing a range of patients’ cognitive and emotional needs. Conclusion This Delphi study provides initial insights regarding a panel of musculoskeletal practitioners’ attitudes towards CFs during chronic LBP rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. All five CF domains were perceived as capable of influencing patient outcomes, with the patient-practitioner relationship being perceived as the most important CF during routine clinical practice. Musculoskeletal practitioners may require further training to enhance their proficiency and confidence in applying essential psychosocial skills to address the complex needs of patients with chronic LBP.
Chiropractic, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
Firas Mourad, Marzia Stella Yousif, Filippo Maselli
et al.
Abstract Background and Objective High-velocity low-amplitude thrust spinal manipulation (SM) is a recommended and commonly used manual therapy intervention in physiotherapy. Beliefs surrounding the safety and effectiveness of SM have challenged its use, and even advocated for its abandonment. Our study aimed to investigate the knowledge and beliefs surrounding SM by Italian physiotherapists compared with similar practitioners in other countries. Methods An online survey with 41 questions was adapted from previous surveys and was distributed via a mailing list of the Italian Physiotherapists Association (March 22–26, 2020). The questionnaire was divided into 4 sections to capture information on participant demographics, utilization, potential barriers, and knowledge about SM. Questions were differentiated between spinal regions. Attitudes towards different spinal regions, attributes associated with beliefs, and the influence of previous educational background were each evaluated. Results Of the 7398 registered physiotherapists, 575 (7.8%) completed the survey and were included for analysis. The majority of respondents perceived SM as safe and effective when applied to the thoracic (74.1%) and lumbar (72.2%) spines; whereas, a smaller proportion viewed SM to the upper cervical spine (56.8%) as safe and effective. Respondents reported they were less likely to provide and feel comfortable with upper cervical SM (respectively, 27.5% and 48.5%) compared to the thoracic (respectively, 52.2% and 74.8%) and lumbar spines (respectively, 46.3% and 74.3%). Most physiotherapists (70.4%) agreed they would perform additional screening prior to upper cervical SM compared to other spinal regions. Respondents who were aware of clinical prediction rules were more likely to report being comfortable with SM (OR 2.38–3.69) and to perceive it as safe (OR 1.75–3.12). Finally, physiotherapists without musculoskeletal specialization, especially those with a traditional manual therapy background, were more likely to perform additional screening prior to SM, use SM less frequently, report being less comfortable performing SM, and report upper cervical SM as less safe (p < 0.001). Discussion The beliefs and attitudes of physiotherapists surrounding the use of SM are significantly different when comparing the upper cervical spine to other spinal regions. An educational background in traditional manual therapy significantly influences beliefs and attitudes. We propose an updated framework on evidence-based SM.
Chiropractic, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
Katie de Luca, Andrew M. Briggs, Simon D. French
et al.
Abstract Background To report the national prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs) and attributable risk factors for all musculoskeletal conditions and separately for low back pain (LBP), as well as compare the disability burden related to musculoskeletal with other health conditions in Australia in 2019. Methods Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 study meta-data on all musculoskeletal conditions and LBP specifically were accessed and aggregated. Counts and age-standardised rates, for both sexes and across all ages, for prevalence, YLDs and attributable risk factors are reported. Results In 2019, musculoskeletal conditions were estimated to be the leading cause of YLDs in Australia (20.1%). There were 7,219,894.5 (95% UI: 6,847,113–7,616,567) prevalent cases of musculoskeletal conditions and 685,363 (95% UI: 487,722–921,471) YLDs due to musculoskeletal conditions. There were 2,676,192 (95% UI: 2,339,327–3,061,066) prevalent cases of LBP and 298,624 (95% UI: 209,364–402,395) YLDs due to LBP. LBP was attributed to 44% of YLDs due to musculoskeletal conditions. In 2019, 22.3% and 39.8% of YLDs due to musculoskeletal conditions and LBP, respectively, were attributed to modifiable GBD risk factors. Conclusions The ongoing high burden due to musculoskeletal conditions impacts Australians across the life course, and in particular females and older Australians. Strategies for integrative and organisational interventions in the Australian healthcare system should support high-value care and address key modifiable risk factors for disability such as smoking, occupational ergonomic factors and obesity.
Chiropractic, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
Peter C. Emary, Kent J. Stuber, Lawrence Mbuagbaw
et al.
Abstract Background Mixed methods designs are increasingly used in health care research to enrich findings. However, little is known about the frequency of use of this methodology in chiropractic research, or the quality of reporting among chiropractic studies using mixed methods. Objective To quantify the use and quality of mixed methods in chiropractic research, and explore the association of study characteristics (e.g., authorship, expertise, journal impact factor, country and year of publication) with reporting quality. Methods We will conduct a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature to identify all chiropractic mixed methods studies published from inception of each database to December 31, 2020. Articles reporting the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods, or mixed qualitative methods, will be included. Pairs of reviewers will perform article screening, data extraction, risk of bias with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and appraisal of reporting quality using the Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guideline. We will explore the correlation between GRAMMS and MMAT scores, and construct generalized estimating equations to explore factors associated with reporting quality. Discussion This will be the first methodological review to examine the reporting quality of published mixed methods studies involving chiropractic research. The results of our review will inform opportunities to improve reporting in chiropractic mixed methods studies. Our results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed publication and presented publicly at conferences and as part of a doctoral thesis.
Chiropractic, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
Anne-Laure Meyer, Michel-Ange Amorim, Martin Schubert
et al.
Résumé Introduction Une hypothèse récente propose que la manipulation vertébrale causerait des changements neurophysiologiques au niveau du cerveau. En Neurologie Fonctionnelle, approche principalement présente en chiropraxie, l’utilisation de la manipulation vertébrale est déjà promue comme capable d’améliorer le fonctionnement du cerveau. A ce jour, aucune revue systématique de la littérature n’a été conduite afin de connaître l’étendue et la qualité de l’évidence scientifique susceptible de justifier cet usage de la manipulation vertébrale. Objectif Déterminer, à travers une revue systématique et critique de la littérature, si la manipulation vertébrale a un effet (spécifique) sur le cerveau et, si oui, si celui-ci est associé à un effet clinique. Méthode Le moteur de recherche PubMed et deux bases de données, Embase et PEDro, ont fait l’objet d’une recherche bibliographique (actualisée en février 2018). Les critères d’inclusion étaient: essais contrôlés, randomisés ou non, dans lesquels la manipulation vertébrale avait été comparée à un placébo ou à un autre type de contrôle, chez des sujets symptomatiques ou asymptomatiques. La manipulation vertébrale pouvait avoir été effectuée au niveau de n’importe quelle région de la colonne vertébrale et les critères de jugement utilisés devaient être indiqués comme capables de mesurer, directement ou indirectement, une forme ‘d’activité cérébrale’. La qualité méthodologique des études a été évaluée de manière indépendante par au moins deux chercheurs à l’aide d’une grille de qualité créée pour les besoins de cette revue. Les études ont été classifiées comme étant de qualité méthodologique ‘acceptable’, ‘moyenne’, ou ‘faible’. Les résultats ont été rapportés de façon narrative, en fonction du type de contrôle utilisé (placébo, ‘inactif’, ou ‘autre stimulus physique’) et du type de sujets d’étude (sans problème de santé, symptomatiques, ou présentant des « douleurs rachidiennes subcliniques »), en tenant compte de la qualité méthodologique. Seuls les résultats issus de comparaisons inter-groupes ont été pris en compte dans notre analyse finale. Résultats Dix-huit articles parmi les 1514 titres obtenus ont été inclus. Les études étaient pour la plupart de qualité méthodologique ‘faible’ ou ‘moyenne’ et avaient principalement comparé la manipulation vertébrale à une intervention autre que placébo. Les résultats rapportés dans 13 des 18 articles inclus ont finalement été pris en compte. Un effet transitoire sur différentes formes ‘d’activité cérébrale’ a été rapporté à l’issue de trois études dans lesquelles la manipulation vertébrale avait été comparée à un placébo (de crédibilité cependant incertaine), chez des sujets présentant des « douleurs rachidiennes subcliniques » (n = 2) ou souffrant de cervicalgies non spécifiques aiguës / subaiguës (n = 1). Une potentielle association avec un effet clinique n’a pas été étudiée dans ces trois études, de qualité méthodologique ‘moyenne’ (n = 2) ou ‘acceptable’ (n = 1). Dans les 10 études restantes, la plupart de qualité méthodologique ‘faible’ ou ‘moyenne’, la manipulation vertébrale avait été comparée à un contrôle ‘inactif’ ou à un ‘autre stimulus physique’. Des différences inter-groupes y ont également été rapportées, parfois de façon inconsistante. Conclusion La littérature scientifique suggère que des changements neurophysiologiques surviennent au niveau du cerveau en réponse à la manipulation vertébrale mais, de façon inconsistante. La pertinence clinique de ces changements n’est pas connue. Ainsi, il est prématuré d’attribuer à la manipulation vertébrale des bénéfices cliniques via un effet sur le cerveau.
Chiropractic, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
Abstract Background Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder. There is little consensus on the etiology, but one explanatory model suggests that PFPS can be caused by referred pain. Neurodynamic tests are used to explore the mechanosensitivity of peripheral nerves, and previous studies have shown a relationship between increased mechanosensitivity and anterior knee pain by using the femoral slump test (FST). Previously the prone knee bend test (PKB) does not appear to have been included. The main purpose of this pilot study was to examine whether there was an identifiable difference in mechanosensitivity between left and right sides that could be identified using both the PKB and FST tests for the femoral nerve in patients with unilateral PFPS. Methods This cross-sectional pilot study tested 12 patients with unilateral PFPS for altered mechanosensitivity using both PKB and FST. The pain-free knee was used as a control. The selected test procedures were similar to those clinicians use in everyday practice. Results 8 and 4 of the 12 patients were found to have increased levels of mechanosensitivity in the PFPS leg using the PKB and FST, respectively. Both tests provoked stronger pain in the leg with PFPS compared with the asymptomatic leg (p < 0.05 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test). The symptoms were more often located in the anterior knee, with structural differentiation by neck flexion appearing to increase the symptoms more when testing the leg with PFPS. Conclusions Although the reliability of the tests is unknown and the study sample size was small, the PKB and FST test procedures used in clinical practice appear capable of revealing altered mechanosensitivity in unilateral PFPS patients. The PKB test appears to detect mechanosensitivity in more patients than the FST. We recommend including both tests in future larger blinded controlled studies which should also assess reliability of the tests. Trial registration ISRCTN 12473526. Registered 20 May 2015, retrospectively registered.
Chiropractic, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system