Semantic Scholar Open Access 2014 1429 sitasi

Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data*

Andrew Bell K. Jones

Abstrak

This article challenges Fixed Effects (FE) modeling as the ‘default’ for time-series-cross-sectional and panel data. Understanding different within and between effects is crucial when choosing modeling strategies. The downside of Random Effects (RE) modeling—correlated lower-level covariates and higher-level residuals—is omitted-variable bias, solvable with Mundlak's (1978a) formulation. Consequently, RE can provide everything that FE promises and more, as confirmed by Monte-Carlo simulations, which additionally show problems with Plümper and Troeger's FE Vector Decomposition method when data are unbalanced. As well as incorporating time-invariant variables, RE models are readily extendable, with random coefficients, cross-level interactions and complex variance functions. We argue not simply for technical solutions to endogeneity, but for the substantive importance of context/heterogeneity, modeled using RE. The implications extend beyond political science to all multilevel datasets. However, omitted variables could still bias estimated higher-level variable effects; as with any model, care is required in interpretation.

Topik & Kata Kunci

Penulis (2)

A

Andrew Bell

K

K. Jones

Format Sitasi

Bell, A., Jones, K. (2014). Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data*. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7

Akses Cepat

Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2014
Bahasa
en
Total Sitasi
1429×
Sumber Database
Semantic Scholar
DOI
10.1017/psrm.2014.7
Akses
Open Access ✓