Why Neuroethical Analyses of Invasiveness in Psychiatry Should Engage with Mental Health Service User Movement Knowledges and Considerations of Social In/Justice
Abstrak
Birks, D., and Douglas, T., eds. 2018. Treatment for crime: Philosophical essays on neurointerventions in criminal justice. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. Bluhm, R., M. Cortright, E. D. Achtyes, and L. Y. Cabrera. 2023. “They are invasive in different ways.”: Stakeholders’ perceptions of the invasiveness of psychiatric electroceutical interventions. AJOB Neuroscience 14 (1):1–12. doi:10. 1080/21507740.2021.1958098. Bublitz, C. 2018. The soul is the prison of the body. In D. Birks & T. Douglas (eds.), Treatment for crime: Philosophical essays on neurointerventions in criminal justice, 289–320. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Douglas, T. 2014. Criminal rehabilitation through medical intervention: Moral liability and the right to bodily integrity. Journal of Ethics 18:101. Forsberg, L. 2021. Anti-libidinal interventions and the law. Human Rights Law Review 21 (2):384–408. doi:10.1093/ hrlr/ngab001. Kirchmair, L. 2019. Objections to coercive neurocorrectives for criminal offenders – why offenders’ human rights should fundamentally come first. Criminal Justice Ethics 38 (1):19–40. doi:10.1080/0731129X.2019.1586216. Knehans, R., T. Schuhmann, D. Roef, H. Nelen, J. A Campo, and J. Lobbestael. 2022. Modulating Behavioural and self-reported aggression with non-invasive brain stimulation: A literature review. Brain Sciences 12 (2):200. doi:10.3390/brainsci12020200. Ligthart, S. 2022. Coercive brain-reading in criminal justice: An analysis of European human rights law. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press. Ligthart, S., T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas, and G. Meynen. 2021. Closed-loop brain devices in offender rehabilitation: Autonomy, human rights, and accountability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (4): 669–80. doi:10.1017/S0963180121000141. Michalowski, S. 2020. Critical reflections on the need for a right to mental self-determination. In A. von Arnauld, K. von der Decken & M. Susi (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of new human rights: Recognition, novelty, rhetoric 404–411. Padstow: Cambridge University Press. Ryberg, J. 2019. Neurointerventions, crime, and punishment: Ethical considerations. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. Sergiou, C. S., E. Santarnecchi, S. M. Romanella, M. J. Wieser, I. H. Franken, E. G. Rassin, and J. D. van Dongen. 2022. Transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the ventromedial prefrontal cortex reduces reactive aggression and modulates electrophysiological responses in a forensic population. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging 7 (1):95.
Topik & Kata Kunci
Penulis (2)
A. de Bie
Daniel Z. Buchman
Akses Cepat
PDF tidak tersedia langsung
Cek di sumber asli →- Tahun Terbit
- 2022
- Bahasa
- en
- Total Sitasi
- 2×
- Sumber Database
- Semantic Scholar
- DOI
- 10.1080/21507740.2022.2150715
- Akses
- Open Access ✓