Chance, Evolution, and the Metaphysical Implications of Paleontological Practice
Abstrak
For several decades, a debate has been waged over how to interpret the significance of fossils from the Burgess Shale and Cambrian Explosion. Stephen Jay Gould argued that if the “tape of life” was rerun, then the resulting lineages would differ radically from what we find today, implying that humans are a happy accident of evolution. Simon Conway Morris argued that if the “tape of life” was rerun, the resulting lineages would be similar to what we now observe, implying that intelligence would still emerge from an evolutionary process. Recent methodological innovations in paleontological practice call into question both positions and suggest that global claims about the history of life, whether in terms of essential contingency or predictable convergence, are unwarranted.
Topik & Kata Kunci
Penulis (1)
A. Love
Akses Cepat
- Tahun Terbit
- 2021
- Bahasa
- en
- Sumber Database
- Semantic Scholar
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-75797-7_7
- Akses
- Open Access ✓