Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.
Abstrak
Replication-an important, uncommon, and misunderstood practice-is gaining appreciation in psychology. Achieving replicability is important for making research progress. If findings are not replicable, then prediction and theory development are stifled. If findings are replicable, then interrogation of their meaning and validity can advance knowledge. Assessing replicability can be productive for generating and testing hypotheses by actively confronting current understandings to identify weaknesses and spur innovation. For psychology, the 2010s might be characterized as a decade of active confrontation. Systematic and multi-site replication projects assessed current understandings and observed surprising failures to replicate many published findings. Replication efforts highlighted sociocultural challenges such as disincentives to conduct replications and a tendency to frame replication as a personal attack rather than a healthy scientific practice, and they raised awareness that replication contributes to self-correction. Nevertheless, innovation in doing and understanding replication and its cousins, reproducibility and robustness, has positioned psychology to improve research practices and accelerate progress. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Topik & Kata Kunci
Penulis (16)
B. Nosek
T. Hardwicke
Hannah Moshontz
Aurélien Allard
Katherine S. Corker
Anna Dreber
F. Fidler
J. Hilgard
Melissa Kline Struhl
Michèle B. Nuijten
J. Rohrer
Felipe Romero
Anne M. Scheel
L. D. Scherer
F. Schönbrodt
S. Vazire
Akses Cepat
- Tahun Terbit
- 2020
- Bahasa
- en
- Total Sitasi
- 501×
- Sumber Database
- Semantic Scholar
- DOI
- 10.31234/OSF.IO/KSFVQ
- Akses
- Open Access ✓