Semantic Scholar Open Access 2020 199 sitasi

Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction

Nuo Xu Pinghui Wang Long Chen Li Pan Xiaoyan Wang +1 lainnya

Abstrak

Legal Judgement Prediction (LJP) is the task of automatically predicting a law case’s judgment results given a text describing the case’s facts, which has great prospects in judicial assistance systems and handy services for the public. In practice, confusing charges are often presented, because law cases applicable to similar law articles are easily misjudged. To address this issue, existing work relies heavily on domain experts, which hinders its application in different law systems. In this paper, we present an end-to-end model, LADAN, to solve the task of LJP. To distinguish confusing charges, we propose a novel graph neural network, GDL, to automatically learn subtle differences between confusing law articles, and also design a novel attention mechanism that fully exploits the learned differences to attentively extract effective discriminative features from fact descriptions. Experiments conducted on real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of our LADAN.

Topik & Kata Kunci

Penulis (6)

N

Nuo Xu

P

Pinghui Wang

L

Long Chen

L

Li Pan

X

Xiaoyan Wang

J

Junzhou Zhao

Format Sitasi

Xu, N., Wang, P., Chen, L., Pan, L., Wang, X., Zhao, J. (2020). Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.280

Akses Cepat

Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2020
Bahasa
en
Total Sitasi
199×
Sumber Database
Semantic Scholar
DOI
10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.280
Akses
Open Access ✓