Semantic Scholar Open Access 2020 64 sitasi

Efficiency in Islamic vs. conventional banking: The role of capital and liquidity

Mohammad Bitar Kuntara Pukthuanthong Thomas J. Walker

Abstrak

Abstract We show that higher capital and liquidity ratios increase the efficiency of conventional and Islamic banks. Using conditional quantile regressions, we further show that the effect is stronger for highly efficient, small, highly liquid, and highly capitalized conventional banks. We also find that more capitalized and liquid banks were efficient during the 2008/2009 financial crisis and the Arab Spring. Our findings support the view that the constraints imposed by Shari'a law may widen the efficiency gap between the two bank types, at the expense of Islamic banks. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the efficiency of conventional banks not only depends on bank capital and liquidity, but also on the level of bank efficiency while the relationship is inconclusive for Islamic banks. These findings provide insight into how capital and liquidity can shape bank efficiency. They suggest that higher capital and liquidity buffers serve a constraint on policymakers and may function very differently depending on the level of bank efficiency.

Topik & Kata Kunci

Penulis (3)

M

Mohammad Bitar

K

Kuntara Pukthuanthong

T

Thomas J. Walker

Format Sitasi

Bitar, M., Pukthuanthong, K., Walker, T.J. (2020). Efficiency in Islamic vs. conventional banking: The role of capital and liquidity. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GFJ.2019.100487

Akses Cepat

Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.1016/J.GFJ.2019.100487
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2020
Bahasa
en
Total Sitasi
64×
Sumber Database
Semantic Scholar
DOI
10.1016/J.GFJ.2019.100487
Akses
Open Access ✓