Semantic Scholar Open Access 2020 123 sitasi

Whiteness and Urban Planning

E. Goetz Rashad Williams A. Damiano

Abstrak

Abstract Problem, research strategy, and findings: The ability of planning to address America’s urban problems of inequality, crime, housing, education, and segregation is hampered by a relative neglect of Whiteness and its role in shaping urban outcomes. We offer a justification for centering Whiteness within urban planning scholarship and practice that would examine its role shaping and perpetuating regional and racial injustices in the American city. The focus of planners, scholars, and public discourse on the “dysfunctions” of communities of color, notably poverty, high levels of segregation, and isolation, diverts attention from the structural systems that produce and reproduce the advantages of affluent and White neighborhoods. Planners and planning scholars frequently invoke a “legacy of injustice” with regard to concentrated poverty and disadvantage but not in regard to neighborhoods of White affluence. One is segregated and problematized and the other is idealized. Takeaway for practice: Planners and planning scholars need to understand the role of Whiteness, in particular White affluence, to assess the potential impacts of planning interventions. Doing so will inform a wider range of planning approaches to problems of racial and spatial equity.

Topik & Kata Kunci

Penulis (3)

E

E. Goetz

R

Rashad Williams

A

A. Damiano

Format Sitasi

Goetz, E., Williams, R., Damiano, A. (2020). Whiteness and Urban Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1693907

Akses Cepat

PDF tidak tersedia langsung

Cek di sumber asli →
Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1693907
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2020
Bahasa
en
Total Sitasi
123×
Sumber Database
Semantic Scholar
DOI
10.1080/01944363.2019.1693907
Akses
Open Access ✓