Semantic Scholar Open Access 2019 456 sitasi

Ecological Intensification: Bridging the Gap between Science and Practice.

D. Kleijn R. Bommarco T. Fijen L. Garibaldi S. Potts +1 lainnya

Abstrak

There is worldwide concern about the environmental costs of conventional intensification of agriculture. Growing evidence suggests that ecological intensification of mainstream farming can safeguard food production, with accompanying environmental benefits; however, the approach is rarely adopted by farmers. Our review of the evidence for replacing external inputs with ecosystem services shows that scientists tend to focus on processes (e.g., pollination) rather than outcomes (e.g., profits), and express benefits at spatio-temporal scales that are not always relevant to farmers. This results in mismatches in perceived benefits of ecological intensification between scientists and farmers, which hinders its uptake. We provide recommendations for overcoming these mismatches and highlight important additional factors driving uptake of nature-based management practices, such as social acceptability of farming.

Topik & Kata Kunci

Penulis (6)

D

D. Kleijn

R

R. Bommarco

T

T. Fijen

L

L. Garibaldi

S

S. Potts

W

Wim H. van der Putten

Format Sitasi

Kleijn, D., Bommarco, R., Fijen, T., Garibaldi, L., Potts, S., Putten, W.H.v.d. (2019). Ecological Intensification: Bridging the Gap between Science and Practice.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002

Akses Cepat

Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2019
Bahasa
en
Total Sitasi
456×
Sumber Database
Semantic Scholar
DOI
10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002
Akses
Open Access ✓