Reimagining Scholarship: A Response to the Ethical Concerns of AUTOGEN

Checco, A., L. Bracciale, P. Loreti, S. Pinfield, and G. Bianchi. 2021. AI-assisted Peer review. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications 8. doi:10.1057/s41599020-00703-8. Flaherty, C. 2022. The peer-review crisis. Inside Higher Ed [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/ news/2022/06/13/peer-review-crisis-creates-problems-jou rnals-and-scholars [Accessed 06/08/2023]. Mclean, S., G. J. M. Read, J. Thompson, C. Baber, N. A. Stanton, and P. M. Salmon. 2023. The risks associated with artificial general intelligence: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 35 (5):649–63. doi:10.1080/0952813X.2021. 1964003. Nam, J., S. Mo, J. Lee, and J. Shin. 2023. Breaking the spurious causality of conditional generation via fairness intervention with corrective sampling. arXiv:2212.02090 [cs.CV]. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2212.02090. Porsdam Mann, S., B. D. Earp, N. Møller, S. Vynn, and J. Savulescu. 2023. AUTOGEN: A personalized large language model for academic enhancement—ethics and proof of principle. The American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):28–41. doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2233356. Weber-Wulff, D., A. Anohina-Naumeca, S. Bjelobaba, T. Folty nek, J. Guerrero-Dib, O. Popoola, P. Sigut, &, and L. Wadding. 2023. Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. arXiv:2306.15666 [cs.CL]. doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2306.15666. Zupanc, G. K. H. 2023. It is becoming increasingly difficult to find reviewers”—Myths and facts about Peer review. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. doi:10.1007/s00359023-01642-w.