Semantic Scholar Open Access 2022 3 sitasi

How is model-related uncertainty quantified and reported in different disciplines?

Emily G. Simmonds K. P. Adjei Christoffer Wold Andersen J. C. H. Aspheim Claudia Battistin +83 lainnya

Abstrak

: How do we know how much we know? Quantifying uncertainty associated with our modelling work is the only way we can answer how much we know about any phenomenon. With quantitative science now highly influential in the public sphere and the results from models translating into action, we must support our conclusions with sufficient rigour to produce useful, reproducible results. Incomplete consideration of model-based uncertainties can lead to false conclusions with real world impacts. Despite these potentially damaging consequences, uncertainty consideration is incomplete both within and across scientific fields. We take a unique interdisciplinary approach and conduct a systematic audit of model-related uncertainty quantification from seven scientific fields, spanning the biological, physical, and social sciences. Our results show no single field is achieving complete consideration of model uncertainties, but together we can fill the gaps. We propose opportunities to improve the quantification of uncertainty through use of a source framework for uncertainty consideration, model type specific guidelines, improved presentation, and shared best practice. We also identify shared outstanding challenges (uncertainty in input data, balancing trade-offs, error propagation, and defining how much uncertainty is required). Finally, we make nine concrete recommendations for current practice (following good practice guidelines and an uncertainty checklist, presenting uncertainty numerically, and propagating model-related uncertainty into conclusions), future research priorities (uncertainty in input data, quantifying uncertainty in complex models, and the importance of missing uncertainty in different contexts), and general research standards across the sciences (transparency about study limitations and dedicated uncertainty sections of manuscripts).

Penulis (88)

E

Emily G. Simmonds

K

K. P. Adjei

C

Christoffer Wold Andersen

J

J. C. H. Aspheim

C

Claudia Battistin

N

Nicola Bulso

H

H. Christensen

B

Benjamin Cretois

R

Ryan Cubero

I

Iv'an A. Davidovich

L

Lisa Dickel

B

Benjamin Dunn

E

E. Dunn‐Sigouin

K

Karin Dyrstad

S

S. Einum

D

D. Giglio

H

Haakon Gjerløw

A

Amélie Godefroidt

R

Ricardo González-Gil

S

Soledad Gonzalo Cogno

F

Fabian Große

P

Paul Halloran

M

M. Jensen

J

J. Kennedy

P

Peter Egge Langsaether

J

Jack H. Laverick

D

Debora Lederberger

C

Camille Li

E

Elizabeth G. Mandeville

C

C. Mandeville

E

E. Moe

T

T. Schroder

D

D. Nunan

J

J. Parada

M

M. Simpson

E

Emma Skarstein

C

C. Spensberger

R

Richard J. Stevens

A

A. Subramanian

L

Lea Svendsen

O

Ole Magnus Theisen

C

Connor Watret

R

R. B. O. D. O. M. Sciences

N

Norwegian University of Science

T

Technology

T

The Fritz Haber Center for Molecular Dynamics

D

Department of Sociology

P

Political Science

K

Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience

C

Centre for Neural Computation

A

Atmospheric

O

Oceanic

P

Planetary Physics

U

U. Oxford

M

Miljodate

N

Norwegian Institute for Nature Research

D

Department of Medical Biology

G

G. Institute

U

Universityof Bergen

B

Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research

U

U. C. A. Boulder

P

Peace Research Institute Oslo

D

D. O. Mathematics

S

Statistics

U

U. Strathclyde

D

D. .. Ecology

F

Federal Institute of Hydrology

G

Germany

C

College of Life

E

E. Sciences

U

U. Exeter

D

Department of Materials Science

M

Metals Office

U

Uk

D

Department of Materials Science

U

U. Oslo

S

Schweizerisches Epilepsie Zentrum

K

Klinik Lengg

Z

Zurich

S

Switzerland.

C

College of Materials Science

U

University of Guelph

D

Department of Natural History

N

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

D

D. Health

N

Nursing

C

Clinical Research Unit Central Norway

S

S. Hospital

Format Sitasi

Simmonds, E.G., Adjei, K.P., Andersen, C.W., Aspheim, J.C.H., Battistin, C., Bulso, N. et al. (2022). How is model-related uncertainty quantified and reported in different disciplines?. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.12179

Akses Cepat

Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.12179
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2022
Bahasa
en
Total Sitasi
Sumber Database
Semantic Scholar
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2206.12179
Akses
Open Access ✓