The effectiveness of public participation through forest advisory committees: Twenty years of shifting perspectives of Local Citizens Committee members in Ontario

In Canada, the most widespread approach to citizen participation in forestry decision-making is forest advisory committees. In this paper, we report on the results of a survey of forest advisory committee members that has been repeated every few years since 2001. We clustered the survey questions to create composite variables representing seven dimensions of the functioning and effectiveness of forest advisory committees: efficiency, representation, voice, decision-making process, trust in forest managers, effectiveness, and the availability, relevance, complexity and trustworthiness of information. While most committee members continue to view the process positively, after a steady improvement of committee members’ overall assessments since 2001, in the most recent survey, the proportion of those who are unsatisfied has grown. Moreover, effectiveness has consistently been assessed less favourably than the other six dimensions that we considered—dimensions upon which effectiveness presumably depends. Part of the reason is that a significant minority of committee members feel that they have little meaningful influence over forest management and that the relevance of the committees has declined. This points to the need for continual attention from policymakers to the matter of how and how much forest advisory committees are enabled to influence the direction of forest management.