DOAJ Open Access 2014

Has the Naturalistic Fallacy Refutation Truly Defeated Classical Natural Law Theory?

Carlos A. Casanova

Abstrak

This paper considers and distinguishes two objections which ordinarily are thought to oppose a realistic conception of ethics: G. E. Moore’s naturalistic fallacy and Hume’s law. After having presented both objections, having developed their presuppositions and consequences and having answered each of them, the paper concludes that it is possible to hold today a realistic conception of ethics. It is structured in the style of a disputed question, divided in six articles.

Topik & Kata Kunci

Metaphysics Philosophy (General)

Penulis (1)

Carlos A. Casanova

Format Sitasi

APA MLA BibTeX

Casanova, C.A. (2014). Has the Naturalistic Fallacy Refutation Truly Defeated Classical Natural Law Theory?. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ASEM.2014.v47.45801

Akses Cepat

PDF tidak tersedia langsung

Cek di sumber asli →

Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.5209/rev_ASEM.2014.v47.45801

Informasi Jurnal

Tahun Terbit: 2014
Sumber Database: DOAJ
DOI: 10.5209/rev_ASEM.2014.v47.45801
Akses: Open Access ✓