Mobile atmospheric measurements and local-scale inverse estimation of the location and rates of brief CH₄ and CO₂ releases from point sources

<p>We present a local-scale atmospheric inversion framework to estimate the location and rate of methane (CH<span class="inline-formula">₄</span>) and carbon dioxide (CO<span class="inline-formula">₂</span>) releases from point sources. It relies on mobile near-ground atmospheric CH<span class="inline-formula">₄</span> and CO<span class="inline-formula">₂</span> mole fraction measurements across the corresponding atmospheric plumes downwind of these sources, on high-frequency meteorological measurements, and on a Gaussian plume dispersion model. The framework exploits the scatter of the positions of the individual plume cross sections, the integrals of the gas mole fractions above the background within these plume cross sections, and the variations of these integrals from one cross section to the other to infer the position and rate of the releases. It has been developed and applied to provide estimates of brief controlled CH<span class="inline-formula">₄</span> and CO<span class="inline-formula">₂</span> point source releases during a 1-week campaign in October 2018 at the TOTAL experimental platform TADI in Lacq, France. These releases typically lasted 4 to 8 min and covered a wide range of rates (0.3 to 200 g CH<span class="inline-formula">₄</span>/s and 0.2 to 150 g CO<span class="inline-formula">₂</span>/s) to test the capability of atmospheric monitoring systems to react fast to emergency situations in industrial facilities. It also allowed testing of their capability to provide precise emission estimates for the application of climate change mitigation strategies. However, the low and highly varying wind conditions during the releases added difficulties to the challenge of characterizing the atmospheric transport over the very short duration of the releases. We present our series of CH<span class="inline-formula">₄</span> and CO<span class="inline-formula">₂</span> mole fraction measurements using instruments on board a car that drove along roads <span class="inline-formula">∼50</span> to 150 m downwind of the 40 m <span class="inline-formula">×</span> 60 m area for controlled releases along with the estimates of the release locations and rates. The comparisons of these results to the actual position and rate of the controlled releases indicate <span class="inline-formula">∼10</span> %–40 % average errors (depending on the inversion configuration or on the series of tests) in the estimates of the release rates and <span class="inline-formula">∼30</span>–40 m errors in the estimates of the release locations. These results are shown to be promising, especially since better results could be expected for longer releases and under meteorological conditions more favorable to local-scale dispersion modeling. However, the analysis also highlights the need for methodological improvements to increase the skill for estimating the source locations.</p>