Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Revascularization: From Concept to Clinical Maturity

Over the past decades, coronary revascularization has evolved dramatically with the introduction of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs), designed to provide temporary vessel support, elute antiproliferative drugs, and then fully resorb, ideally restoring natural vasomotion and eliminating long-term foreign-body reactions. Early enthusiasm for first-generation polymeric devices, such as the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold, was tempered by increased rates of scaffold thrombosis and late adverse events, largely attributed to thick struts, suboptimal implantation techniques, and unpredictable degradation kinetics. Subsequent developments in polymeric (e.g., MeRes-100, NeoVas) and metallic magnesium-based scaffolds (e.g., Magmaris) have focused on thinner struts, improved radial strength, and refined resorption profiles. Clinical trials and meta-analyses, including ABSORB, AIDA, BIOSOLVE, and BIOSTEMI, reveal that optimized procedural strategies, especially the “PSP” approach (Prepare–Size–Post-dilate) and routine intravascular imaging, substantially reduce thrombosis and restenosis rates, aligning outcomes closer to those of contemporary drug-eluting stents (DESs). Nonetheless, challenges persist regarding inflammatory responses to degradation by-products, mechanical fragility in complex lesions, and patient selection. Ongoing innovations include hybrid polymer–metal designs, stimuli-responsive drug coatings, and AI-assisted imaging for precision implantation. While early-generation BRSs demonstrated both promise and pitfalls, next-generation platforms show steady progress toward achieving the dual goals of transient scaffolding and long-term vessel restoration. The current trajectory suggests that bioresorbable technology, supported by optimized technique and material science, may soon fulfill its original vision; offering safe, effective, and fully resorbable alternatives to permanent metallic stents in coronary artery disease. This review provides an updated synthesis of the design principles, clinical outcomes, and procedural considerations of drug-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs). It integrates recent meta-analytic evidence and emerging insights on device mechanics, including the influence of strut thickness on radial strength and the potential role of non-invasive imaging in pre-implantation planning. Special focus is given to magnesium-based scaffolds and future directions in patient selection and implantation strategy.