Veterinary Students’ Assessment of 3D Anatomical Prints as New Teaching Material in Practical Veterinary Anatomy Classes

This work aims to evaluate students’ opinions on the materials normally used in anatomy practical classes (fixed and plastinated) compared to 3D anatomical prints. For this purpose, students of anatomy enrolled in the Degree in Veterinary Medicine from the University of Murcia filled out a satisfaction survey about both kinds of material. The students rated the fixed material with a satisfaction percentage close to 100% and the plastinated material with a percentage higher than 75%. Regarding the 3D prints, the percentage obtained was consistently higher than 50% except for two issues: the identification of the vascular structures of the dolphin’s head and the usefulness for surgery of the viscera and vascular structures of the cat, both of which scored less than 50%. This could be related to the lesser knowledge of dolphins of the veterinary students as well as the complexity of these structures. However, the other questions, such as usefulness for learning and exam preparation, the quality of the anatomical piece, the identification of the feline spleen and kidneys, etc. obtained a satisfaction percentage between 58 and 90.40%. This reflects the good acceptance by students of the 3D prints and may allow for a reduction in the number of cadavers used.