DOAJ Open Access 2025

Ethical arguments that support intentional animal killing

Benjamin L. Allen Benjamin L. Allen Andrew J. Abraham Robert Arlinghaus Robert Arlinghaus +47 lainnya

Abstrak

Killing animals is a ubiquitous human activity consistent with our predatory and competitive ecological roles within the global food web. However, this reality does not automatically justify the moral permissibility of the various ways and reasons why humans kill animals – additional ethical arguments are required. Multiple ethical theories or frameworks provide guidance on this subject, and here we explore the permissibility of intentional animal killing within (1) consequentialism, (2) natural law or deontology, (3) religious ethics or divine command theory, (4) virtue ethics, (5) care ethics, (6) contractarianism or social contract theory, (7) ethical particularism, and (8) environmental ethics. These frameworks are most often used to argue that intentional animal killing is morally impermissible, bad, incorrect, or wrong, yet here we show that these same ethical frameworks can be used to argue that many forms of intentional animal killing are morally permissible, good, correct, or right. Each of these ethical frameworks support constrained positions where intentional animal killing is morally permissible in a variety of common contexts, and we further address and dispel typical ethical objections to this view. Given the demonstrably widespread and consistent ways that intentional animal killing can be ethically supported across multiple frameworks, we show that it is incorrect to label such killing as categorically unethical. We encourage deeper consideration of the many ethical arguments that support intentional animal killing and the contexts in which they apply.

Topik & Kata Kunci

Penulis (52)

B

Benjamin L. Allen

B

Benjamin L. Allen

A

Andrew J. Abraham

R

Robert Arlinghaus

R

Robert Arlinghaus

J

Jerrold L. Belant

D

Daniel T. Blumstein

C

Christopher Bobier

M

Michael J. Bodenchuk

M

Marcus Clauss

S

Stuart J. Dawson

S

Stuart J. Dawson

S

Stuart W. G. Derbyshire

S

Sam M. Ferreira

S

Sam M. Ferreira

P

Peter J. S. Fleming

P

Peter J. S. Fleming

T

Tim Forssman

V

Vanessa Gorecki

C

Christian Gortázar

A

Andrea S. Griffin

J

Jordan O. Hampton

J

Jordan O. Hampton

P

Peter M. Haswell

G

Graham I. H. Kerley

C

Christopher H. Lean

C

Christopher H. Lean

F

Frédéric Leroy

J

John D. C. Linnell

J

John D. C. Linnell

K

Kate Lynch

K

Kate Lynch

C

Celesté Maré

H

Haemish Melville

L

Liaan Minnie

L

Liaan Minnie

Y

Yoshan Moodley

D

Danial Nayeri

M

M. Justin O’Riain

D

Dan Parker

S

Stéphanie Périquet-Pearce

G

Gilbert Proulx

F

Frans G. T. Radloff

A

Alexander Schwab

S

Sarah-Anne Jeanetta Selier

S

Sarah-Anne Jeanetta Selier

S

Samuel Shephard

M

Michael J. Somers

T

T. Adam Van Wart

K

Kurt C. Vercauteren

E

Erica von Essen

E

Erica von Essen

Format Sitasi

Allen, B.L., Allen, B.L., Abraham, A.J., Arlinghaus, R., Arlinghaus, R., Belant, J.L. et al. (2025). Ethical arguments that support intentional animal killing. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2025.1684894

Akses Cepat

PDF tidak tersedia langsung

Cek di sumber asli →
Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2025.1684894
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2025
Sumber Database
DOAJ
DOI
10.3389/fevo.2025.1684894
Akses
Open Access ✓