Development of a Theoretical and Conceptual Framework for the Transformation of Military Conflicts

Purpose: to identify transformational trends that define the development of modern military thought and practice. Method: historical, comparative analysis, systematic approach, and structural analysis methods. Findings: Since the late 20th and early 21st centuries, radical changes in the development of military thought and military-political practice have significantly impacted evolving perspectives on the use of military force. Theoretical implications: Classical theories of war lack contemporary dynamism. The emergence of the 4th and 5th generations of warfare in the last 30 years, and predictions about a 6th, suggest this. A key theme in modern theories is the shift in the philosophy of applying force. The distortion of the classical threat model, the decentralization of military violence, and the emergence of new methods and forms of conflict undermine classical theories and further refine modern perspectives. Practical implications: Classical theories of war lack contemporary dynamism. The emergence of the 4th and 5th generations of warfare in the last 30 years, and predictions about a 6th, suggest this. A key theme in modern theories is the shift in the philosophy of applying force. The distortion of the classical threat model, the decentralization of military violence, and the emergence of new methods and forms of conflict undermine classical theories and further refine modern perspectives. Value: This article allows practitioners to examine the evolving dynamics of warfare from ancient times to the present, focusing on the key determinants of radical shifts in perspectives on the use of force at the beginning of the 21st century. Paper type: theoretical.