DOAJ Open Access 2014

Evidence-based medicine and prejudice-based medicine: the case of homeopathy

Nelson Filice de Barros Alessandra Rodrigues Fiuza

Abstrak

In recent decades an important social movement related to Complementary and Alternative Medicine has been identified worldwide. In Brazil, although homeopathy was recognized as a specialist medical area in 1980, few medical schools offer courses related to it. In a previous study, 176 resident doctors at the University of Campinas Medical School were interviewed and 86 (49%) rejected homeopathy as a subject in the core medical curriculum. Thus, this qualitative study was conducted to understand their reasons for refusing. 20 residents from 15 different specialist areas were interviewed. Very few of them admitted to a lack of knowledge for making a judgment about homeopathy; none of them made a conscientious objection to it; and the majority demonstrated prejudice, affirming that there is not enough scientific evidence to support homeopathy, defending their position based on personal opinion, limited clinical practice and on information circulated in the mass media. Finally, resident doctors’ prejudices against homeopathy can be extended to practices other than allopathic medicine.

Penulis (2)

N

Nelson Filice de Barros

A

Alessandra Rodrigues Fiuza

Format Sitasi

Barros, N.F.d., Fiuza, A.R. (2014). Evidence-based medicine and prejudice-based medicine: the case of homeopathy. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00183513

Akses Cepat

PDF tidak tersedia langsung

Cek di sumber asli →
Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00183513
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2014
Sumber Database
DOAJ
DOI
10.1590/0102-311X00183513
Akses
Open Access ✓