Analysis of causal effects on metabolic syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease: a Mendelian randomization study

Abstract Background Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a conglomerate of metabolic abnormalities including hypertension, obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The relationship between MetS and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) has received a lot of attention lately. Epidemiological investigation has yet to determine if the two illnesses are causally related. To investigate the causal link between IBD and MetS levels, we screened publically available genome-wide association study (GWAS) data using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. The study aimed to comprehensively analyze the causal association of each component of MetS, including fasting blood glucose(FBG), HDL-C, triglyceride(TG), waist circumference(WC), and hypertension, on the risk of IBD and its subtypes via univariate, two-way, and multivariate MR (MVMR) methods. Methods We selected independent genetic variants of MetS and IBD as instrumental variables (IVs) from published data from the IEU OpenGWAS project and IIBDGC (International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetic Consortium), used MR to infer potential causal effects between them, and used a variety of methods (random effect inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger regression, etc.) to ensure the robustness of causal effects. Results Univariate two-sample MR (TSMR) revealed that WC was significantly linked to the risk of Crohn’s disease (CD) (OR = 1.659; 95% CI: 1.144–2.405; p = 0.008) and IBD (OR = 1.383; 95% CI: 1.050–1.822; p = 0.021). However, MVMR did not support this finding. In MVMR analysis, hypertension was predicted to be positively associated with the risk of IBD (OR = 2.322516, 95% CI: 1.097713–4.91392, p = 0.0275365), whereas FBG was confirmed to reduce the risk of CD in MVMR studies (OR = 0.4346427, 95% CI: 0.2685399–0.7034868, p = 0.0006948939). Other elements of the MetS did not significantly correlate with IBD. Conclusion Although confounding factors cannot be completely ruled out, certain metabolic components, such as WC, may impact the risk of IBD. In addition to highlighting the need for more research to understand the underlying mechanisms and potential indirect effects between MetS components and IBD, this research offers insight into therapeutic treatment decisions for patients with IBD and MetS.