High versus low pneumoperitoneum PressUre for parenchymal transection in minimally invasive major liver surgery (PPULS)—a non-inferiority, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial
Abstrak
Abstract Background Low pneumoperitoneum pressure (LPP) lowers the incidence of CO2 embolisms in minimally invasive liver resections (MILR), while higher pneumoperitoneum pressure (HPP) reduces intraoperative blood loss. This contradiction necessitates careful pressure management especially in major liver resections where intraoperative blood loss greatly impacts postoperative outcome. Methods In this randomized non-inferiority trial, adults undergoing elective MILR for any indication will be recruited in alignment with inclusion and exclusion criteria. After given informed consent, eligible patients will be randomized to either low (≤10 mmHg) or high (≥14 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum pressure during parenchymal transection. Blood, peritoneal biopsies, and liver tissue will be sampled to evaluate intraoperative tissue damage. Sample size (n = 66 patients per group) is calculated based on the current literature. The primary study endpoint is intraoperative blood loss during the parenchymal transection phase. Secondary endpoints include CO2 embolisms, intraoperative tissue damage, operation time, morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospitalization. Discussion Minimizing intraoperative blood loss in MILR is a clinically relevant problem, which greatly impacts the procedure’s safety and influences the patient’s morbidity and mortality. HPP, exerting counter pressure to the vascular pressure, serves for bleeding control in MILR. The risk of CO2 embolism, arising from the combination of high intra-abdominal pressure and low central venous pressure, favors the use of LPP. The proposed trial aims to assess the non-inferiority of LPP compared to HPP during the parenchymal transection phase of MILR. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06770803. First Submitted: 2024-12-30, First Submitted that Met QC Criteria: 2025-01-07, First Posted: 2025-01-13.
Topik & Kata Kunci
Penulis (15)
Esther Giehl-Brown
Elias Khajeh
Sarah Dehne
Zoltan Czigany
Oliver Gutzeit
Christopher Neuhaus
Carina Riediger
Emrullah Birgin
Nuh Rahbari
Mathieu D’Hondt
Georg Lurje
Markus Weigand
Christoph Michalski
Arianeb Mehrabi
Christoph Kahlert
Format Sitasi
Akses Cepat
- Tahun Terbit
- 2025
- Sumber Database
- DOAJ
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13063-025-09269-9
- Akses
- Open Access ✓