DOAJ Open Access 2021

Phenomenology, Saudi Arabia, and an argument for the standardization of clinical ethics consultation

Abram Brummett Ruaim Muaygil

Abstrak

Abstract Background The purpose of this study is to make a philosophical argument against the phenomenological critique of standardization in clinical ethics. We used the context of clinical ethics in Saudi Arabia to demonstrate the importance of credentialing clinical ethicists. Methods Philosophical methods of argumentation and conceptual analysis were used. Results We found the phenomenological critique of standardization to be flawed because it relies on a series of false dichotomies. Conclusions We concluded that the phenomenological framing of the credentialing debate relies upon two extreme views to be navigated between, not chosen among, in the credentialing of clinical ethicists.

Topik & Kata Kunci

Medical philosophy. Medical ethics

Penulis (2)

Abram Brummett

Ruaim Muaygil

Format Sitasi

APA MLA BibTeX

Brummett, A., Muaygil, R. (2021). Phenomenology, Saudi Arabia, and an argument for the standardization of clinical ethics consultation. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-021-00099-6

Akses Cepat

PDF tidak tersedia langsung

Cek di sumber asli →

Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.1186/s13010-021-00099-6

Informasi Jurnal

Tahun Terbit: 2021
Sumber Database: DOAJ
DOI: 10.1186/s13010-021-00099-6
Akses: Open Access ✓