DOAJ Open Access 2025

Assessing the impact of clerkships on the growth of clinical knowledge

Chi Chang Heather S. Laird-Fick John D. Mitchell Carol Parker David Solomon

Abstrak

Purpose This study quantified the impact of clinical clerkships on medical students’ disciplinary knowledge using the Comprehensive Clinical Science Examination (CCSE) as a formative assessment tool.Methods This study involved 155 third-year medical students in the College of Human Medicine at Michigan State University who matriculated in 2016. Disciplinary scores on their individual Comprehensive Clinical Science Examination reports were extracted by digitizing the bar charts using image processing techniques. Segmented regression analysis was used to quantify the differences in disciplinary knowledge before, during, and after clerkships in five disciplines: surgery, internal medicine, psychiatry, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology (ob/gyn).Results A comparison of the regression intercepts before and during their clerkships revealed that, on average, the participants improved the most in ob/gyn ([Formula: see text]11.193, p[Formula: see text].0001), followed by psychiatry ([Formula: see text]10.005, p[Formula: see text].001), pediatrics ([Formula: see text]6.238, p[Formula: see text].0001), internal medicine ([Formula: see text]1.638, p[Formula: see text].30), and improved the least in surgery ([Formula: see text]−2.332, p[Formula: see text].10). The regression intercepts of knowledge during their clerkships and after them, on the other hand, suggested that students’ average scores improved the most in psychiatry ([Formula: see text]7.649, p[Formula: see text].008), followed by ob/gyn ([Formula: see text]4.175, p[Formula: see text].06), surgery ([Formula: see text]4.106, p[Formula: see text].007), and pediatrics ([Formula: see text]1.732, p[Formula: see text].32).Conclusions These findings highlight how clerkships influence the acquisition of disciplinary knowledge, offering valuable insights for curriculum design and assessment. This approach can be adapted to evaluate the effectiveness of other curricular activities, such as tutoring or intersessions. The results have significant implications for educators revising clerkship content and for students preparing for the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2.

Topik & Kata Kunci

Penulis (5)

C

Chi Chang

H

Heather S. Laird-Fick

J

John D. Mitchell

C

Carol Parker

D

David Solomon

Format Sitasi

Chang, C., Laird-Fick, H.S., Mitchell, J.D., Parker, C., Solomon, D. (2025). Assessing the impact of clerkships on the growth of clinical knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2443812

Akses Cepat

PDF tidak tersedia langsung

Cek di sumber asli →
Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2443812
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2025
Sumber Database
DOAJ
DOI
10.1080/07853890.2024.2443812
Akses
Open Access ✓