Evaluating environmental and economic impacts of three farming systems in Northern Nigeria

Abstract Achieving Net Zero Emissions in vegetable production systems is a critical challenge in dryland climates of low- and middle-income countries, yet limited data exists to assess the feasibility of such systems. This study employs life cycle inventory methods to evaluate key performance metrics, including yield per land area, production costs, cumulative energy demand (CED), global warming potential (GWP), and water use (WU) for Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) in screen houses and field-based tomato production systems in Northern Nigeria. The findings reveal that CEA, despite its high production cost of ₦24,070.80 per m², achieves the highest yield of 28.57 kg per m². Additionally, CEA demonstrates superior efficiency, exhibiting the lowest C ED (0.025 MJ/kg) and GWP (0.76 kg CO₂-eq/kg). In contrast, rainfed field production, while having the lowest cost (₦58.45 per m²), results in the lowest yield (0.08 kg/m²) and the highest GWP (34,545.8%). Irrigated field production performs moderately, with a production cost of ₦150.38 per m², a yield of 0.22 kg per m², and a GWP of 12,572.4%. A key factor influencing yield variation across production systems is the difference in tomato varieties cultivated in open-field and CEA environments. CEA relies on hybrid varieties optimized for controlled conditions, whereas open-field farming utilizes varieties adapted to outdoor environmental fluctuations, contributing to disparities in yield potential. This study highlights the trade-offs between cost, yield, energy efficiency, and environmental impact across different production models. The results underscore the advantages of adopting more efficient and controlled cultivation methods like CEA, offering potential pathways for sustainable and environmentally responsible agricultural practices in regions facing climate and resource constraints.