Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of the Mayo Additive Staging System and Minimal Residual Disease in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

ABSTRACT Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the Mayo additive staging system (MASS) and minimal residual disease (MRD) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Methods A total of 238 NDMM patients were enrolled in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital. Fluorescence in‐situ hybridization and next‐generation flow cytometry were used to examine cytogenetic abnormalities and MRD, respectively. The patients were classified into three groups to compare the effects on progression‐free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify the survival‐related factors. Results For MASS group, the PFS was significant difference in MASS I, II, and III patients (p = 0.0006); the patients with sustained MRD‐negative, non‐sustained MRD‐negative, sustained MRD‐positive, and non‐sustained MRD‐positive were divided into Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The Group 1 patients had superior PFS than Groups 2 and 3 patients (p < 0.05), but no difference in PFS was observed for Group 2 versus Group 3, Group 2 versus Group 4, and Group 3 versus Group 4 patients. For the MASS and MRD groups, among Groups 2, 3, and 4, MASS I patients had a superior PFS, while III patients showed the opposite result. Strikingly, no difference in PFS for Group 1 patients regardless of the MASS stage was observed. Despite being in MASS II and III, the PFS of Group 1 patients was longer than those with the other three groups. Response to treatment was an independent prognostic factor for MM patients. Conclusion Patients with an accumulation of high‐risk factors and MRD‐positive have poor outcomes. Sustained MRD‐negative may improve high‐risk patients' prognoses.