Standardising Peer Review in Paleontology journals
Abstrak
The purpose of this operational checklist serves one primary purpose: For an article to 'pass' peer review, articles must satisfy a specific quality threshold based on standardised guidelines. Thus, the quality of the peer review process is simultaneously ensured through an open and technical standardisation process. This should be of interest to all stakeholders engaged in the publishing process, including authors, editors, reviewers, and the publishers themselves, who all have a duty to uphold the integrity of the published research record. While it might initially increase the bureaucracy involved in publishing, ultimately it should save time and effort as it becomes more widely established as an embedded scholarly norm, with integrity a formative part of peer review culture.
Penulis (1)
Jonathan Tennant
Akses Cepat
- Tahun Terbit
- 2020
- Bahasa
- en
- Sumber Database
- CrossRef
- DOI
- 10.31233/osf.io/qzycs
- Akses
- Open Access ✓