CrossRef Open Access 2025

Electroslag Refining (ESR) for Sustainable Battery Recycling: Technological Innovations, Economic Viability, and Patent Landscape in Low-Cost Electricity Regions

Sudhakar Geruganti

Abstrak

Electroslag refining (ESR) emerges as a complementary battery recycling solution in regions with electricity costs below $0.06/kWh. This study demonstrates that ESR achieves 92% Co/Ni recovery at $14/kg operating costs when powered by renewable energy, compared to $19/kg for hydrometallurgy. Technological innovations include Li₂O-doped slag (1-5 wt%) reducing lithium losses to <5% and IoT-controlled current modulation cutting energy use by 18%. A global patent analysis identifies white spaces in apparatus design (WIPO class C22B9/16), while techno-economic modeling reveals optimal viability in Quebec (hydro) and Rajasthan (solar) regions. Despite lower Li recovery (68% vs hydro's 80%), ESR's 35% carbon footprint reduction and slag valorization potential (92% as cement additive) position it as a sustainable alternative under EU Taxonomy criteria Detailed Description Technological Innovations Li₂O-Doped Slag Design: Composition: CaF₂-Al₂O₃-Li₂O (80-15-5 wt%) Performance: 89% Li retention vs. 62% in conventional slags at 1600°C Mechanism: Li₂O increases slag basicity, reducing Li volatility Smart ESR Systems: IoT sensors optimize current density (0.5-1.2 A/mm²) Reduces energy consumption from 12 → 9.8 kWh/kg Co Economic Viability Region Electricity Cost ($/kWh) ESR Viability Index* Key Enablers Quebec 0.04 88/100 Existing aluminum smelters Norway 0.03 95/100 Battery passport infrastructure Rajasthan 0.05 72/100 Solar park colocation *Based on 5 factors: energy cost, infrastructure, policy, demand, logistics       Patent Landscape White Spaces: Direct ESR processing of pyrolyzed black mass (no prior USPTO patents) Slag compositions with 1-5% Li₂O (novelty confirmed via Espacenet search) Risk Areas: Avoid infringement on Umicore's hydrometallurgy patents (US2018367232) Design-around Tesla's direct recycling claims through high-temperature differentiation Sustainability Impact Carbon Footprint: ESR: 2.1 kg CO₂/kg metal vs. 3.8 kg for pyrometallurgy Further reducible to 1.4 kg with renewable electricity Waste Valorization: 92% of slag meets ASTM C989 for cement additives Potential offset of $50/ton disposal costs

Penulis (1)

S

Sudhakar Geruganti

Format Sitasi

Geruganti, S. (2025). Electroslag Refining (ESR) for Sustainable Battery Recycling: Technological Innovations, Economic Viability, and Patent Landscape in Low-Cost Electricity Regions. https://doi.org/10.31224/5038

Akses Cepat

PDF tidak tersedia langsung

Cek di sumber asli →
Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.31224/5038
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2025
Bahasa
en
Sumber Database
CrossRef
DOI
10.31224/5038
Akses
Open Access ✓