Electroslag Refining (ESR) for Sustainable Battery Recycling: Technological Innovations, Economic Viability, and Patent Landscape in Low-Cost Electricity Regions
Abstrak
Electroslag refining (ESR) emerges as a complementary battery recycling solution in regions with electricity costs below $0.06/kWh. This study demonstrates that ESR achieves 92% Co/Ni recovery at $14/kg operating costs when powered by renewable energy, compared to $19/kg for hydrometallurgy. Technological innovations include Li₂O-doped slag (1-5 wt%) reducing lithium losses to <5% and IoT-controlled current modulation cutting energy use by 18%. A global patent analysis identifies white spaces in apparatus design (WIPO class C22B9/16), while techno-economic modeling reveals optimal viability in Quebec (hydro) and Rajasthan (solar) regions. Despite lower Li recovery (68% vs hydro's 80%), ESR's 35% carbon footprint reduction and slag valorization potential (92% as cement additive) position it as a sustainable alternative under EU Taxonomy criteria Detailed Description Technological Innovations Li₂O-Doped Slag Design: Composition: CaF₂-Al₂O₃-Li₂O (80-15-5 wt%) Performance: 89% Li retention vs. 62% in conventional slags at 1600°C Mechanism: Li₂O increases slag basicity, reducing Li volatility Smart ESR Systems: IoT sensors optimize current density (0.5-1.2 A/mm²) Reduces energy consumption from 12 → 9.8 kWh/kg Co Economic Viability Region Electricity Cost ($/kWh) ESR Viability Index* Key Enablers Quebec 0.04 88/100 Existing aluminum smelters Norway 0.03 95/100 Battery passport infrastructure Rajasthan 0.05 72/100 Solar park colocation *Based on 5 factors: energy cost, infrastructure, policy, demand, logistics Patent Landscape White Spaces: Direct ESR processing of pyrolyzed black mass (no prior USPTO patents) Slag compositions with 1-5% Li₂O (novelty confirmed via Espacenet search) Risk Areas: Avoid infringement on Umicore's hydrometallurgy patents (US2018367232) Design-around Tesla's direct recycling claims through high-temperature differentiation Sustainability Impact Carbon Footprint: ESR: 2.1 kg CO₂/kg metal vs. 3.8 kg for pyrometallurgy Further reducible to 1.4 kg with renewable electricity Waste Valorization: 92% of slag meets ASTM C989 for cement additives Potential offset of $50/ton disposal costs
Penulis (1)
Sudhakar Geruganti
Akses Cepat
- Tahun Terbit
- 2025
- Bahasa
- en
- Sumber Database
- CrossRef
- DOI
- 10.31224/5038
- Akses
- Open Access ✓