CrossRef Open Access 2017 17 sitasi

Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus

Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh

Abstrak

PurposeThis study aims to provide an extensive overview of OA journals’ status and quality in 27 research areas based on all Scopus-indexed journals. It shows the volume of OA journals, proportion of publications in OA journals and the quality of these journals in comparison with subscription-based counterparts.Design/methodology/approachThis research investigated 22,256 active peer-reviewed journals indexed by Scopus in 2015. Data were gathered using the Journal Metrics website. The current research adopted four indicators to compare the quality of OA and non-OA journals indexed in Scopus under each subject area, namely citedness rate, CiteScore, SNIP and SJR.FindingsOA journals comprised approximately 17 per cent out of the total journals indexed by Scopus in 2015. The results revealed an uneven spread of OA journals across disciplines, ranged from 5.5 to 28.7 per cent. Studying the quality of journals as measured by CiteScore, SJR SNIP leads us to the finding that, in all research areas, except for health profession and nursing, non-OA journals attain statistically significant higher average quality than do OA journals.Originality/valueAlthough OA publishing improves the visibility of scholarly journals, this increase is not always coupled with increase in journals’ impact and quality.

Penulis (1)

M

Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh

Format Sitasi

Erfanmanesh, M. (2017). Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/cb-02-2017-0007

Akses Cepat

PDF tidak tersedia langsung

Cek di sumber asli →
Lihat di Sumber doi.org/10.1108/cb-02-2017-0007
Informasi Jurnal
Tahun Terbit
2017
Bahasa
en
Total Sitasi
17×
Sumber Database
CrossRef
DOI
10.1108/cb-02-2017-0007
Akses
Open Access ✓